The Giraffe Boards

The Giraffe Boards (https://www.giraffeboards.com/index.php)
-   The Dungeon (https://www.giraffeboards.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   A Wizards True Name - Night 1 (https://www.giraffeboards.com/showthread.php?t=37869)

Red Skeezix 9th March 2015 03:49 PM

A Wizards True Name - Night 1
 
During a day of much debate and bickering, the assembled sorcerers discussed how best to use their powers to divine the murderer of their MC. They firmly decided yes they should use their powers to discover the identities of those who might be perpetrators of this heinous crime. And the most efficient way would be to kill someone and divine the mysteries from their entrails, well extrails.

The votes were tied at the end: Gnarly 6, Zuma 6. This made the wizards feel a bit hasty and not so eager to shed blood just yet.

No one was lynched on Day 1.


Random org tie results (if number > 90, both would have died)

Random Integer Generator

Here are the numbers, generated with randomization based on persistent identifier zuma v gnarlycharlie:

41



Note, the rules contain an error. The night will be 48 hours to allow for the amount of potential night actions. All actions must be submitted with a timestamp no later than 3/11/2015 at 6:59 pm EDT.

Reminder: Strategy is allowed for all teams at Night.

Mahaloth 9th March 2015 04:16 PM

OK, can we get a comprehensive list of name claims and investigation claims so we can organize them?

Giraffe 9th March 2015 04:20 PM

Continued from Day thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1163041)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Giraffe (Post 1163024)
Wait, I think I finally spotted guiri's N0 reference! I will give a coded hint as to location: boobs. I can explain once we have more confirmation and withdraw my FOS for now, although I still hate the vote.

Now I just want to know that gnarlycharlie actually knows something about his name and isn't just piggybacking onto guiri's claim.

what do you want, an actual name?

Read post #212. I asked you to tell me the third letter of your name.

TexCat 9th March 2015 04:26 PM

Does anyone else want to claim to be Ito? So far we have me, BillMc, and Scathach. I suggest that Bill, as the towniest, should determine the investigations in our circle.

zuma 9th March 2015 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexCat (Post 1163084)
Does anyone else want to claim to be Ito? So far we have me, BillMc, and Scathach. I suggest that Bill, as the towniest, should determine the investigations in our circle.

I remain opposed to name claims. I worry scum's investigative abilities might allow them to discover their first names.

And since when is Bill the "towniest"????

Mahaloth 9th March 2015 05:19 PM

I can take gnarly or guiri since my name is, I think, closest to theirs. Has either been claimed yet?

Colby11 9th March 2015 08:10 PM

Apologies for not posting

And I still disagree about revealing anything.

Swammerdami 9th March 2015 09:03 PM

I think we should continue to do partial name claims (and perhaps associated challenges) during this Night. If someone in Guiri's name circle is NightKilled it will be too late to challenge others in the circle to see if they really know the name.

Here are the name claims so far:

ITO:
BillMc, Texcat, Scathach

3 letters with R and no I,T,O
Swammi

3 letters with R + one of I,T,O
Guiri, Gnarlycharlie, Chaos, giraffe (R first)

3 letters with R
Mahaloth, Mrs McGinty

3 letters
Bufftabby, Lightfoot

Provided no info
Visorslash, Zuma, Sister Coyote, Dizzymrslizzy, Colby11

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The following Investigations are subject to change as more name claims occur toNight. But let's put something "on paper" for clarity.

Investigations:
Chaos investigates Guiri
Guiri investigates Gnarly
Gnarly investigates Chaos
Zuma investigates Mahaloth
Texcat investigates Scathach


Chaos investigates giraffe
giraffe investigates Guiri
Scathach investigates BillMc
BillMc investigates Texcat
Bufftabby investigates Lightfoot
Lightfoot investigates Bufftabby
Mahaloth investigate Mrs McGinty
Mrs McGinty investigates Swammi
Swammi investigates Zuma

(I've italicised announcements from the Day thread, changing one to squeeze giraffe into a circle. Subject to change as those providing minimal info -- Mahaloth, Bufftabby, etc. -- provide more info.)

LightFoot 9th March 2015 09:52 PM

A investigating B AND B investigating A would be redundant. unless A or B is strongly thought to be Scum?
or am I too tired and stressed to post?

Swammerdami 9th March 2015 10:02 PM

I don't think it's completely redundant, but you're right that
A→B→C→A
would be better.
If you, Lightfoot, are willing to state whether you're in Swammi's clique, Mahaloth's clique, or another clique altogether, and others do the same, we can come up with a better investigation schedule.

LightFoot 9th March 2015 10:39 PM

so far we have

players that are not saying
players with an r without an i -or-t-or-o
players with an r with an i-or-t-or-o
subset with a player with an R at the beginning
and- players named Ito

because of past experience I feel that if I say I have a q and a player ends up revealed as Town ( therefore a lynch or NK) with a q in their name that any player with said claimed q will be the lynch target for Town the next Day-

not saying I won't - later in game- but not this early

we already know that more than 2 have claimed the same first name- I don't have that one

Bill was the first to claim Ito ( probably Town- if Scum was not given cover)

Giraffe was first to claim R as first letter (a tad less but still probably Town- if Scum was not given cover)



everyone else cautious- as I am- so nothing there

guiri 9th March 2015 10:52 PM

Why would another player with Q become a lynch target? If anything they'd be a target for a NK if they'd managed to post a unique clue regarding their name. Later in the game means nothing because you'll have reveals, investigation results, claims and so on to give you a foolproof claim. Day and Night 1, unless scum have cover roles, are the only times that Town are the only players to know their first names.

Giraffe, I'm glad you found my reference.

Swammi, I'm OK with the proposed changes to the investigations, I will investigate Gnarly.

LightFoot 9th March 2015 11:15 PM

Guiri- for the investigations to hold water- for either side I suppose-- in theory every Scum has a Town 'twin'-in my little brain- so if a Town has a q and they are removed then any other player with a q would be the possible twin ie Scum- because Town usually lynches more people that Scum does

why a NK since Scum don't know what their first name is?

BillMc 9th March 2015 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zuma (Post 1163088)
I remain opposed to name claims. I worry scum's investigative abilities might allow them to discover their first names.

And if they know their own first names, then what?

The only 'power' in the rules they have related to names is a day kill - and they are hardly going to use that on themselves.

Either you know more than you are letting on, or are way off base.

Swammerdami 9th March 2015 11:50 PM

I'm glad guiri and giraffe found a way to confirm each other's names without letting Scum guess what that name is. Perhaps Gnarlycharlie should find a subtle hint that lets others in his clique know he knows the name without giving Scum more clues.

Remember: It is urgent we do these name confirmations during this cycle. After Dawn, Scum will know another name and be better able to hide.

@ Mahaloth, Mrs McGinty : Does your R name, like mine, have no I, T or O? If so, I hope you post a subtle hint about the name (no need to give away a letter) so we're confident we've the same name.

LightFoot 10th March 2015 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillMc (Post 1163161)
Quote:

Originally Posted by zuma (Post 1163088)
I remain opposed to name claims. I worry scum's investigative abilities might allow them to discover their first names.

And if they know their own first names, then what?

The only 'power' in the rules they have related to names is a day kill - and they are hardly going to use that on themselves.

Either you know more than you are letting on, or are way off base.

only a wild guess investigation would give Scum their personal first name . but if all Town posts theirs they will knowa the options of same - some options are ok to help Town but maybe not all?

guiri 10th March 2015 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LightFoot (Post 1163160)
Guiri- for the investigations to hold water- for either side I suppose-- in theory every Scum has a Town 'twin'-in my little brain- so if a Town has a q and they are removed then any other player with a q would be the possible twin ie Scum- because Town usually lynches more people that Scum does

why a NK since Scum don't know what their first name is?

I realise you're just putting any argument together for the sake of buying time, any excuse not to reveal your name will do for now but I'll entertain you... If both players share unique clues about their first name on Day 1, the chance of one of them being scum is actually quite tiny - short of scum having cover roles and therefore the entire thing is moot. If you have 5 letters, with a Q starting with R and someone else has 5 letters with a Q ending with Z, when Riqaz 1.0 turns up dead, Riqaz 2.0 is as good as confirmed Town.

Swammerdami 10th March 2015 01:57 AM

Those thinking that partial name claims will do no good, that Red has balanced the game to prevent such, may have it exactly backwards. We could have a largish number of Scum, with the partial name claims the only way for Town to get balance.

And, if the claims do give Town a big advantage, does that mean we should pass up the chance? I recall a game at IdleMafia a year ago or so where Town could win easily with similar name claims, but Town procrastinated, not thinking the game could be so easily broken, and the game dragged on and on with even the Mod abandoning it!

I think my Lynch votes for the duration will be directed against those refusing to offer hints to their names.

Mahaloth 10th March 2015 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heterometrus swammerdami (Post 1163163)

@ Mahaloth, Mrs McGinty : Does your R name, like mine, have no I, T or O? If so, I hope you post a subtle hint about the name (no need to give away a letter) so we're confident we've the same name.

Subtle hint.

Anyway, I am leaving my investigation where it is for now because everyone else in my category is being investigated already.

gnarlycharlie 10th March 2015 04:41 AM

i can investigate Giraffe if no one else is.

zuma 10th March 2015 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillMc (Post 1163161)
Quote:

Originally Posted by zuma (Post 1163088)
I remain opposed to name claims. I worry scum's investigative abilities might allow them to discover their first names.

And if they know their own first names, then what?

The only 'power' in the rules they have related to names is a day kill - and they are hardly going to use that on themselves.

Either you know more than you are letting on, or are way off base.

Then this: To have a successful investigation, both parties must have the same first and last name. If scum discover their first names, then it follows that they would target those with the same first names for night kills. It increases the odds of them eliminating someone who could uncover them in an investigation.

I'll allow I might be off base, if so please educate me.

Mahaloth 10th March 2015 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1163175)
i can investigate Giraffe if no one else is.

I was going to, but isn't Chaos?

BillMc 10th March 2015 05:14 AM

For scum *a* scum to discover their first name, they would need to have a successful investigation....so say there are 4 scum - town have 13 investigations tonight, scum have 1....their nk will be a shot in the dark, as will the investigation. If they are luck with the investigation, then yes, they have potentially a 'better' candidate for a nk. But within 2 nights, town has the potential of 24 investigations - if used well, could provide a lot of information.

LightFoot 10th March 2015 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guiri (Post 1163165)
Quote:

Originally Posted by LightFoot (Post 1163160)
Guiri- for the investigations to hold water- for either side I suppose-- in theory every Scum has a Town 'twin'-in my little brain- so if a Town has a q and they are removed then any other player with a q would be the possible twin ie Scum- because Town usually lynches more people that Scum does

why a NK since Scum don't know what their first name is?

I realise you're just putting any argument together for the sake of buying time, any excuse not to reveal your name will do for now but I'll entertain you... If both players share unique clues about their first name on Day 1, the chance of one of them being scum is actually quite tiny - short of scum having cover roles and therefore the entire thing is moot. If you have 5 letters, with a Q starting with R and someone else has 5 letters with a Q ending with Z, when Riqaz 1.0 turns up dead, Riqaz 2.0 is as good as confirmed Town.

unique ( as in not stated by anyone prior)- I give you quarter there.

but we are not seeing much of that here.

You like to chew on legs- It has been my caution all game and I am not the only one in that boat. - at least I am trying to share my thought process

Night has a few hours left
no death reveals yet so there is time -

I have left clues to my name before being asked- and now I have to go to work

Giraffe 10th March 2015 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1163175)
i can investigate Giraffe if no one else is.

According to the proposed list, you're supposed to investigate Chaos.

And can I take it that you're opting not to answer my question to confirm that you actually know your name? Can you confirm the clues guiri and I put out there around her N0 post?

Swammerdami 10th March 2015 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heterometrus swammerdami (Post 1163146)
Subtle hint.

Anyway, I am leaving my investigation where it is for now because everyone else in my category is being investigated already.

I'm not sure what "subtle hint" means: are you trying to prove to those in your clique that you are in their clique and know what your name is?

And what does "my investigation where it is" mean? Do you disagree that we should tell each other who we're investigating?

Mrs McGinty 10th March 2015 09:09 AM

Hmm... I've been assuming that first and second names are drawn from two separate banks, but what if they're not? What would it mean for the approach we've taken if one player's first name could be another player's second name?

zuma 10th March 2015 09:09 AM

I've PM'd the mod for a Mahaloth investigation. Done deal for me.

Chaos 10th March 2015 10:54 AM

I've already sent out the PM to investigate Giraffe.

I'd highly encourage that everyone follow the order that was already established. Switching around now will only give scum the chance to slip through the cracks.

Giraffe 10th March 2015 11:23 AM

I've PM'd my guiri investigation.

Dizzymrslizzy 10th March 2015 12:44 PM

God I'm sorry. I completely forgot about this game. I've had a week from hell. Catching up now!

Dizzymrslizzy 10th March 2015 01:28 PM

Okay I've caught up. What a hot mess. I am actually surprised by the players that are suggesting a mass claim. I'm not totally against what has been claimed and will add my own to the table.

I belong in this pile:
3 letters with R + one of I,T,O

I'm dead serious, and sorry Bill for my N0 comment about the Pleo Mind meld....I have um really shirked my responsibilities in this game. I didn't read the rules before posting in the N0 thread and had absolutely no clue what was going on. The comment was supposed to be funny anyway. Anyway, I'm 100% caught up now, and I'm active now! I apologize across the board!

So does that leave Gnarly for me to investigate? Going back to the list to look again.

Dizzymrslizzy 10th March 2015 01:30 PM

okay so I see the three of you (Gnarly, Chaos, Giraffe, Guiri) are investigating each other. Can we shift it a little so we can get another round of investigations in between me and another. I don't care who I investigate.

Chaos 10th March 2015 01:48 PM

You might fit between guiri and charlie, granted that they have not sent their investigations in yet. I'd hold off until you have confirmation from them.

Chaos 10th March 2015 01:53 PM

Also I think I found guiri's hint, which for now makes both him and giraffe seem very town to me.

TexCat 10th March 2015 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heterometrus swammerdami (Post 1163146)
Texcat investigates Scathach
Scathach investigates BillMc
BillMc investigates Texcat

I guess we're not getting any more Ito claims. :sciencefail:

I'm going with this and submitting my Scathach investigation.

guiri 10th March 2015 02:14 PM

Dizzy, you can investigate Gnarly and then I'll investigate you

Dizzymrslizzy 10th March 2015 02:27 PM

Sounds good.

Dizzymrslizzy 10th March 2015 02:33 PM

Okay so not that that's all straightened out....

Do we have a plan on how we are revealing our investigation results. I don't know if we're going to be able to believe many of them until they are at least double checked, since it would be easy for Scum to lie about their results.

gnarlycharlie 10th March 2015 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giraffe (Post 1163195)
Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1163175)
i can investigate Giraffe if no one else is.

According to the proposed list, you're supposed to investigate Chaos.

And can I take it that you're opting not to answer my question to confirm that you actually know your name? Can you confirm the clues guiri and I put out there around her N0 post?

okay. i'll investigate Chaos. as for guiri's N0 hint, i thought i saw it but your comment threw me off.

Giraffe 10th March 2015 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1163307)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Giraffe (Post 1163195)

According to the proposed list, you're supposed to investigate Chaos.

And can I take it that you're opting not to answer my question to confirm that you actually know your name? Can you confirm the clues guiri and I put out there around her N0 post?

okay. i'll investigate Chaos. as for guiri's N0 hint, i thought i saw it but your comment threw me off.

Ignore my comment, then. Give me/us some hint that you know what your name is, and that you know how guiri told me what her name is. Ideally without giving the name away, although at this point I'd rather catch scum by forcing you to demonstrate that you don't know your name than continue dancing around this particular maypole.

guiri 10th March 2015 04:12 PM

FWIW I'm still a he, carry on!

LightFoot 10th March 2015 04:27 PM

I see no downside ( at this time) in telling you that I will investigate BuffT as suggested
( unless that base has been covered)

gnarlycharlie 10th March 2015 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giraffe (Post 1163311)
Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1163307)
okay. i'll investigate Chaos. as for guiri's N0 hint, i thought i saw it but your comment threw me off.

Ignore my comment, then. Give me/us some hint that you know what your name is, and that you know how guiri told me what her name is. Ideally without giving the name away, although at this point I'd rather catch scum by forcing you to demonstrate that you don't know your name than continue dancing around this particular maypole.

i'm not sure how i can do that. but for now it will take my death to tear my name from me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by guiri (Post 1163321)
FWIW I'm still a he, carry on!

right, rest assured i knew you are a he.

Dizzymrslizzy 10th March 2015 06:39 PM

Guiri, don't you know only chicks drink Guinness :p

Giraffe 10th March 2015 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guiri (Post 1163321)
FWIW I'm still a he, carry on!

Goddamnit, I swear we have this conversation every game. Sorry about that, I'm a dumb-dumb. :smack:

Swammerdami 10th March 2015 08:52 PM

On boards which display user gender with each post, I'm Swammerdami.

For this board, I give my name a prefix starting with "He" to make my gender apparent. :thumbs:

LightFoot 10th March 2015 09:02 PM

who was it that used gender neutral to a fault?

not really a fault but it did annoy some.

Scáthach 11th March 2015 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexCat (Post 1163264)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Heterometrus swammerdami (Post 1163146)
Texcat investigates Scathach
Scathach investigates BillMc
BillMc investigates Texcat

I guess we're not getting any more Ito claims. :sciencefail:

I'm going with this and submitting my Scathach investigation.

I've submitted my BillMc investigation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by LightFoot (Post 1163410)
who was it that used gender neutral to a fault?

not really a fault but it did annoy some.

Think that was Flying Squid with Goggles. I didn't mind it myself.

guiri 11th March 2015 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1163364)
i'm not sure how i can do that.

Well, you could start using proper punctuation!

I'm confident Gnarly shares my first name. Again, short of cover roles, this is a strong indicator of towniness, possibly even as good as an investigation for me...

Not so sure about Giraffe or Chaos though, they may have found my hint but have not indicated they know my name yet.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.7 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Management has discontinued messages until further notice.