The Giraffe Boards

The Giraffe Boards (https://www.giraffeboards.com/index.php)
-   The Dungeon (https://www.giraffeboards.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   A Wizards True Name - Night 2 (https://www.giraffeboards.com/showthread.php?t=37908)

Red Skeezix 16th March 2015 03:41 PM

A Wizards True Name - Night 2
 
After Bill's unfortunate demise the night before, the group was even more intent on gathering whatever data they could. Most of the talk focusing on a hints and allusions to what their own true names might be. The more reticent among them quickly found themselves in a web of distrust. But the most reticent among them found himself gasping for air, suspended several feet above the parking lot by an electrical cord tied to the railing of a balcony.

Zuma, AKA Ito Cowpen a Town Wizard has been lynched.

Night 2 begins now, and will continue until Wednesday 3/18 @ 7pm EDT.

TexCat 16th March 2015 03:59 PM

Ugh. :raeg: Wouldn't claiming have been a better option than getting mislynched?

Colby11 16th March 2015 04:19 PM

So, who should I investigate?

LightFoot 16th March 2015 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LightFoot (Post 1163743)
   
playerlooked atsays
1. Mahalothmrs Mno result
2. Visorslash  
3. Chaosgiraffeno result
4. Zumamahalothno result
5. bufftabbyLight Footno result
6. Sister Coyote  
7. texcatscathachtown
8. guiridizzyno result
9. lightfootBuffno result
10. Heterometrus swammerdamizumano result
11. Dizzymrslizzygnarlyno result
12. Giraffeguirino result
13. gnarlycharliechaosno result
14. BillMcNK TownIto Freehold
15. Colby11 no result
16. Mrs. McGintyswammitown
17. Scathachbillholding info


I think this is accurate?

from yesterDay

Mahaloth 16th March 2015 04:43 PM

I will research giraffe.

Mahaloth 16th March 2015 04:43 PM

By research, I meant investigate. I'm tired.

LightFoot 16th March 2015 05:01 PM

UPDATED the first row is hinted ( or known) first names of the wizards
  Night one 
 playerlooked atsays
R1. Mahalothmrs Mno result
?2. Visorslash  
R3. Chaosgiraffeno result
I -Lynch -Town4. Zumamahalothno result
X5. bufftabbyLight Footno result
X6. Sister Coyote  
I7. texcatscathachtown
R8. guiridizzyno result
X9. lightfootBuffno result
X10. Heterometrus swammerdamizumano result
R11. Dizzymrslizzygnarlyno result
R12. Giraffeguirino result
R13. gnarlycharliechaosno result
I-NK-Town14. BillMcNK TownIto Freehold
R15. Colby11giraffeno result
X16. Mrs. McGintyswammitown
I17. Scathachbillholding info
    
incase it helps- should we have another set investigations this round ( seems lop sided to have one player do it every Night )

Giraffe 16th March 2015 05:06 PM

I would like to investigate Chaos or Colby11. I'm fairly suspicious of both of them after last Night's "mistake" investigating me and their conveniently late claims toDay, so I'm not going to believe any claim they make on us sharing a name if they say I came up Town and have to investigate them back anyway, might as well go first.

I'll go with Chaos unless someone really wants to investigate them instead.

Dizzymrslizzy 16th March 2015 05:12 PM

Mahaloth, are you saying you are a RIP also?

Going by the theory that the RIPs have multiple last names....
I think since all of the RIP investigations failed, we need to switch it up a little tonight. I computed 5 more investigations that will yield different results from yesterday. (as in none of the pairs that weren't compatible will be repeated tonight.)

So here are my notes:

Dizzy isn't compatible with Guiri and Gnarly
Chaos isn't compatible with **"Giraffe"** and Gnarly
Guiri isn't compatible with Dizzy and Giraffe
Giraffe isn't compatible with **Chaos** and Guiri
Gnarly isn't compatible with Chaos and Dizzy

Compatible = Got a No Result Investigation
** = Chaos and Colby both investigated Giraffe so it's null data.

Anyway though moving on. This pairing seems to work as to not repeat any incompatibilities above, and give everyone a new target to investigate.

Dizzy investigates Chaos
Chaos investigates Guiri
Guiri investigates Gnarly
Giraffe investigates Dizzy
Gnarly investigates Giraffe

LightFoot 16th March 2015 05:35 PM

In my " group"
there is
1. buff not/compatible LF
2.sis
3.LightFoot n/c buff
4.swammi c/Mrs M ( through 5's investigation )
5.Mrs M confirmed/swammi


None of these are solid at this time ( anyone could be lying- but )

TexCat 16th March 2015 05:59 PM

I'm thinking that there must be at least one more Ito out there. Scathach and I have the same last name. I'm thinking that we must match either Bill or Zuma, but we can't match both. So there has to be one more Ito that matches the other one. Unfortunately, Scathach and I probably won't be able to get results on them.

Repeating from the day thread that I'm going to investigate Visor.

LightFoot 16th March 2015 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexCat (Post 1164736)
I'm thinking that there must be at least one more Ito out there. Scathach and I have the same last name. I'm thinking that we must match either Bill or Zuma, but we can't match both. So there has to be one more Ito that matches the other one. Unfortunately, Scathach and I probably won't be able to get results on them.

Repeating from the day thread that I'm going to investigate Visor.

following that train then Scathach would be a free agent toNight ( assigned - or choosing) one not claiming Ito- right? Scat knows if they matched Bill or not so . something? I lost my thought

TexCat 16th March 2015 06:50 PM

Scathach was planning on investigating me tonight to confirm my result on her.

LightFoot 16th March 2015 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TexCat (Post 1164753)
Scathach was planning on investigating me tonight to confirm my result on her.

if you believe each other that would be redundant. If you don't then...carry on.

My thought was the more unique investigations ( while we have numbers) the better.
Might just be my thought process though

LightFoot 16th March 2015 08:53 PM

it makes sense for me to investigate Sis C. ( to me) but there are others that could as well.

Swammerdami 16th March 2015 10:30 PM

Following is a proposed schedule in which
  • Each living Player is investigated exactly once, and by someone in his/her clique.
  • Players' planned investigations are accomodated.
  • Failed pairings are not repeated (except for Swammi/McGinty and Scathach/Texcat to get double confirmations).
  • A suggestion for Visorslash's investigation connects the final dots, but is redundant.

Guiri investigates Gnarly
Gnarly investigates Mahaloth
Mahaloth investigate giraffe
giraffe investigates Chaos
Chaos investigates Dizzymrslizzy
Dizzymrslizzy investigates Colby11
Colby11 investigates Guiri

Texcat investigates Visorslash
Scathach investigates Texcat
Visorslash investigates Scathach

Swammi investigates Mrs McGinty
Mrs McGinty investigates Lightfoot
Lightfoot investigates Sister Coyote
Sister Coyote investigates Bufftabby
Bufftabby investigates Swammi

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giraffe (Post 1164727)
I'll go with Chaos unless someone really wants to investigate them instead.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dizzymrslizzy (Post 1164728)
...
[propose] Giraffe investigates Dizzy
...

My suggested schedule preserves most of Dizzy's suggestions, but lets Giraffe investigate Chaos, as he requested.

guiri 17th March 2015 12:22 AM

I'm OK with this, will submit order now

Scáthach 17th March 2015 04:13 AM

I'm investigating TexCat

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

Giraffe 17th March 2015 06:41 AM

PM sent.

SisterCoyote 17th March 2015 07:00 AM

PM also sent.

Colby11 17th March 2015 10:50 AM

Private Meal eaten....

Isn't that what everyone was sending?

SisterCoyote 17th March 2015 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colby11 (Post 1164853)
Private Meal eaten....

Isn't that what everyone was sending?

Poor Private Meal. What did he ever do to you?

Chaos 17th March 2015 01:58 PM

PM sent.

bufftabby 17th March 2015 04:59 PM

Also agreed.

LightFoot 17th March 2015 05:20 PM

Swammi although it is appreciated that you have laid out a plan of attack- I have to say again that I think the cross investigations a/b- b/a are redundant this early in the game. leaving the semi claimed as just that makes sense to me until the combinations have been tried ( Math logic from an accountant)

gnarlycharlie 17th March 2015 06:56 PM

okay. Mahaloth for me.

any other ideas why scum would need names?

LightFoot 17th March 2015 07:59 PM

My thoughts- answering charlie

the end game the dk may be handy ( as close to the edge Scum previously it would have been)
scum don't know their first name-the more names they know the better they can cover that

by sharing names - and broadcasting all investigations - scum may know where to block

You and I don't see eye to eye often but I do think this should make sense to you

Colby11 17th March 2015 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SisterCoyote (Post 1164889)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Colby11 (Post 1164853)
Private Meal eaten....

Isn't that what everyone was sending?

Poor Private Meal. What did he ever do to you?

He was trying to be private when I was hungry

gnarlycharlie 17th March 2015 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LightFoot (Post 1165037)
My thoughts- answering charlie

the end game the dk may be handy ( as close to the edge Scum previously it would have been)
scum don't know their first name-the more names they know the better they can cover that

by sharing names - and broadcasting all investigations - scum may know where to block

You and I don't see eye to eye often but I do think this should make sense to you

yes but they can only block one investigation, right? doesn't seem like much.

LightFoot 17th March 2015 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1165067)
Quote:

Originally Posted by LightFoot (Post 1165037)
My thoughts- answering charlie

the end game the dk may be handy ( as close to the edge Scum previously it would have been)
scum don't know their first name-the more names they know the better they can cover that

by sharing names - and broadcasting all investigations - scum may know where to block

You and I don't see eye to eye often but I do think this should make sense to you

yes but they can only block one investigation, right? doesn't seem like much.

One per Night I think---depends of course on which one it is doesn't it?-- I was just answering your question

gnarlycharlie 18th March 2015 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LightFoot (Post 1165076)
Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1165067)

yes but they can only block one investigation, right? doesn't seem like much.

One per Night I think---depends of course on which one it is doesn't it?-- I was just answering your question

yup. still not satisfied with the ideas offered so far though.

LightFoot 18th March 2015 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarlycharlie (Post 1165119)
Quote:

Originally Posted by LightFoot (Post 1165076)

One per Night I think---depends of course on which one it is doesn't it?-- I was just answering your question

yup. still not satisfied with the ideas offered so far though.

Ok charlie I will bite-
do you agree that Scum most likely get names if their investigation is successful?

if not then what?
if so then names have value for Scum- right?

if I can decipher some of your thought processes then maybe you won't seem like Scum damn near every game to me

Red Skeezix 18th March 2015 02:59 PM

Night is over in one minute. Day will be up shortly.

Mahaloth 20th March 2015 04:23 PM

Oh. I guess I'm too late.

And I had already investigate giraffe.

Mahaloth 20th March 2015 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahaloth (Post 1165738)
Oh. I guess I'm too late.

And I had already investigate giraffe.

Ignore this. I got confused. :facepalm:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.7 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Management has discontinued messages until further notice.