View Single Post
  #36  
Old 18th May 2015, 03:53 PM
Archangel's Avatar
Archangel Archangel is offline
She/Her/Hers
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: At large, but currently near NYC
Posts: 8,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiri View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archangel View Post
That leaves Silver Jan and Three, and makes me more nervous about Three, because SJ's claim such as it is seems too far-fetched to be made up out of whole cloth.
What's far-fetched about SJ's claim?

#98 Visited lulz, not nefarious
#100 Looks like lulz was not NK target
#141 Is not the doc
#157 Is not roleblocker
#290 Banishment will reveal three things about her role
#291 Has a role
#296 Is not a roleblocker
#345 Is human, is Mary Winchester
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver Jan View Post
What I did learn was that it doesn't look as if Lulz was the target of a NK, which seems pretty obvious at this time seeing as Archangel was killed. I don't want to say too much right now because although my role isn't all powerful, it could be helpful down the road.
Her claim that she learned Maha was not the target of a NK is interesting since Maha claims he was trying to kill Lulz. Of course we currently believe Maha made a false claim but this would indicate he's not even a killer, or that SJ's claim is also fake.
Farfetched isn't the right word, I suppose. It's too detailed and specific to be a made-up-out-of-thin-cloth claim. Of course now I've said this someone will come up with some game where scum made up a role entirely * and won that way...but these super-specific claims I tend to think are real for the most part, and if they are scum they are just changing a detail or two.
(Although I suppose scum might also be claiming each other's roles-- I've seen that done before successfully.)

I guess it comes down to whether or not there's another roleblock tonight, but I can hold my tongue another day. I'm saying neither Mahaloth's or Jan's claims make me think they're town, but they also don't make me think they're roleblockers.