[Double A]

Originally Posted by Scáthach

Ok nothing has really changed from yesterday after reading d1 again. Still think double A's scummy - if they'd just said "oh I just noticed idrinkthere4iam ' s name" or something it would be fine but they doubled down on it when challenged.

I did what with a cheeseburger?

To be totally honest, I treat every vote I make on day 1 as a joke unless something to make me change my mind comes up. The five days per day phase thing was a hell of a lot longer than I'm used to, and I think it was a lot more productive than the average D1 I've mostly experienced in the past. When the case on Zeener was made, I dropped my ridiculous vote and put it on someone I thought was scum.

I also hate hate hate pizzas push for no lynch. Even if you think both players are town most of the time a no lynch just pushes the same debate a day forward and we end up lynching one of the two the next day anyway. (Interesting though for a mafia variant actually, no one gets lynched til day 5 then everyone votes in order for who they want lynched in one big bloodbath and we see who is left standing at the end )

I think he's said in the past that no lynch always hurts the town, and I'm still not seeing a decent reason to vote for you from him.

Originally Posted by idrinkthere4iam

From day one.

True, but it was a joke vote. So I guess I'm only, like, half a hypocrite.

Also, til our reaction to lulz' post looks like role fishing to me. Basically asking him to provide more about his role PM.

Nah, I was just trying to tell him that giving out his name meant bugger all. Why was he providing that information? What possible use could I have for knowing he's Archimedes? And then I said whatever because it didn't actually matter that much.