Quote:
Originally Posted by idrinkthere4iam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archangel
for reasons previously stated.
|
Previously stated? This?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archangel
Because I'm rereading Day 1 and both Idrink and Double A's votes for Zeener bother me. They are where the bandwagon started. DoubleA didn't even try to justify his vote, but Idrinkthere4Iam did. I happen to agree with Pizza that scum tries to look reasonable (though I don't agree with much else he's saying this game) so:
|
Bandwagon started when Double A jumped on the vote immediately. And didn't really explain why. But since I was reasonable about my reason, I'm the Scum. Got it. Thanks for clarifying. Maybe I should just blind vote next time. That couldn't possibly make me appear Scummy. Shall we ask lulz how that tactic works? Everyone is trying to look reasonable. Don't agree with it, that's fine. But don't accuse me of being Scum because I'm backing up what I say. That's hypocritical. |
If I'm wrong I apologize, I can understand where you are frustrated if you're town and getting called out for making a reasonable argument. This post struck me as very defensive, though, and I'm not sure why it would have to be, since there's no momentum growing on a lynch for you (apart from Pizza apparently adding you to his short list).
This and the next post (where you describe your play style) almost convinced me I was wrong about you, but one thing bothers me about it. You were paying careful enough attention to the voting on Day One to be able to tell me that DoubleA jumped on your vote on Zeener a few posts after (and in your opinion created the bandwagon), yet this wasn't cited as a reason for voting him. That's a big thing to notice and yet not comment on until it's made an issue of (by me).
That being said, I think we need a reveal of lulz or DoubleA toMorrow in order to figure out what's going on here and I think DoubleA should go first. (I think Pizza's tunneling on him being innocent and this he's escaping doom.)