4th October 2018, 04:42 AM
|
 |
Charter Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Soup
Posts: 137
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erinyes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eater of Socks
Either we all vote our top two suspects at least, or we try to keep it to one person to preserve our population .
Sorry it's hard to type right now, just got a wellness screening and i'm down one finger  |
I agree with Purple's assessment that multi-lynch is a Day power with an unknown number of uses, if only because of the fact that Zumsand's death was described as a lynch. I don't know if it's monstrous or heroic -- and because of that, I know that I'd trust the mob's judgment over that of a random player.
What we could try to do is manipulate the vote total so that Kali finishes in second place (assuming they keep no-showing). This would deprive our mystery player of a meaningful choice if they can multi-lynch multi-times.
Like Stocaryn said about mass claims, though, this could be harder than herding cats. As of this moment (Jeopardy 2, Owlbear 2, Kali and others 1), it would actually be impossible without altering the votes of Jeopardy and/or Owlbear. (If there were someone who hadn't voted for Jeopardy and Kali -- or Owlbear and Kali, for that matter -- they could vote for those two and get Kali in second. That doesn't seem like a great idea -- maybe we could just say we can only manipulate Kali's vote to try to get them into second.)
It might be hard to pull off, but I think it would have a tangible benefit. Any thoughts? |
Wouldn't it be better to have the second-most Scummy player in second place? That way if the theoretical multilyncher can get the runner-up lynched, it would be the player we think is second-most Scummy?
|