|
Oh!
And I guess I can talk about Pizza twisting things now that the game it happened in is over. Not that this should really influence takes on my alignment either way, but it should still explain either a) why I reacted the way I did on day one or b) why I thought I had justification to pretend to react the way I did on day one.
We were both in a game on another board recently, both town. I was vanilla. Pizza had a desperado role. He had to find somebody to shoot on day two. If that player was mafia, they'd die; otherwise Pizza would die and the desperado role would be passed on to the person they had targeted. Pizza wound up shooting a town player named Vulgard.
I missed almost all of day one for reasons. During that time, Pizza went super hard on Vulgard for various things. Waffling, for one. Various scum tells. One of those things super stands out because when I was trying to catch up day one on my own during night one, I actually wrote the post number down with a star, it seemed so scummy to me. It was what seemed to be a weird perspective shift in the middle of a thought. I can't remember the exact comment anymore.
Anyway, on day two, this comment came up. I'm the one who brought it up. Somebody else (my brain is telling me it was one of the scum ironically, but it might not have been) pointed out that I might have read the comment wrong, that it actually was consistent and made sense. Vulgard backed it up that that's what they meant. I re-read it myself; it did make sense in that light. I had to drop it as a reason for thinking they were scum. (They were a town read by the end of the day, one of the few things that game I'm proud of getting right.)
Pizza never accepted what Vulgard actually meant. Three people in the thread telling him otherwise -- Vulgard, me and the third player; he never changed his mind. So yeah, he will do that as town.
|