[Red Skeezix]

@Romanic: The reason I didn't answer your question is simple. I already said why I was tempted to vote you. What can easily be read as a soft claim:

Originally Posted by Romanic

Banking votes for the future makes a player more powerful, while taking vote from the future makes someone less powerful. So in a perfect world, the vanillas would be banking their votes, and the pro-town would vote normally (or twice, pulling one from the future).

But of course this would make it too easy for the Scums to spot our best roles. We can't be so obvious, right?

vote X on day 2

(Bolding added)

But since you are confused, Let's look at your post shall we? You hypothesize that in a perfect world vanillas would be banking their votes. And then you say we shouldn't telegraph our plays, but then you bank your vote. I initally read this as a soft vanilla claim or at the very least a vanilla breadcrumb. These sorts of plays are the kind of thing that scum likes to do because they can point back to it later and say "See i've been saying this all along!" or when they get called on it, it's "Oh that was just WIFOM". Hence why I was tempted to vote for you.

Secondly: Oh noes, you posted 6 minutes after me. I don't even know if I was around 6 minutes after you posted. Could you possibly get more meta? This is the weakest reason to include in a vote post that i've seen in a LONG while. You might as well vote because the temperature was different today than yesterday.

Thirdly: I was mistaken about moody being an Idle voter, but my impression was that he was voting for him based on his comments. But then again that tells me more about moody than anyone else.


It's a bit funny though, once lucifer starts making noise about you and me both being scum, all of a sudden you seem to think I'm not answering questions. You didn't seem to notice that I didn't answer in the 2888 minutes that have passed between asking and accusing. Despite the fact that you notice that you asked a question 6 minutes after I made a post.