Quote:
Originally Posted by Total Ulla
As I have said all along. I'm pretty sure a scum join in on the (still to me) weak case of voting Idle for not claiming.
Given all the strange interactions between Giraffe and Zuma I'm inclined to believe them both to be Scum at this point.
However it looks like Giraffe is voting to save Zuma. This leads me to believe that Zuma might have a power role and Giraffe either has the power he has claimed (not that useful since we will all be watching how he use it) or he doesn't have a power at all.
So I'd rather lynch Zuma toDay and then look at Giraffe toMorrow based on what Zuma flips.
Vote Zuma
|
I agree with this logic. If
Zuma flips scum, I think Town has to lynch me. I can't see a way to argue against it, even though I know I'm Town -- I would never let a player who swung the vote from scum to Town at the last minute go unlynched, and I don't expect anyone else to do the same.
If
Zuma flips Town, I think that's pretty strong evidence of my Towniness, as I can't see any scum benefit to sticking my neck out like that to chose one Town player over another, but it's of course not absolute confirmation.
I also agree with your earlier post about a vote-blocker being of dubious and perhaps negative value to Town -- I personally can't see a lot of value in reducing the voting pool without strong reason to believe a given player will vote in a way that is harmful to Town.