Quote:
Originally Posted by Romola
I am still tentatively accepting Idle's and Romanic's claims, mainly on the grounds that Romanic's behaviour has, as far as I can see, been pro-Town. I'm thinking particularly of his willingness to promote his own lynch over Idle's on Day one.
I see Giraffe's double vote yesterDay as trying to ensure the Zeener lynch (a claimed Town doctor, remember. Given that one Town protector had already been lynched, this almost certainly leaves Scum with a clear, or almost clear run), rather than an effort to save Zuma in particular. Giraffe's own claim smells funny, as if it's a scum PM edited to look like a Town one. The power claimed is not a pro-Town one and would be of more benefit to scum, especially as they already have some ability to manipulate the voting with the bringing forward of votes thing (yes, Town have that too, but i think scum have been the ones exploiting it to the full so far).
|
Bolding mine
Romola I'm not too sure what you mean by this part...
So far we've lost a TOWN Mass Roleblocker
A TOWN Weak Doc
And a TOWN Tracker.
Now in your post it (to me ) looks like you're talking about
Giraffes voting actions yesterDay when you state that "one Town protector had already been lynched".
At that point as far as I can see ... NO TOWN protective roles had been lynched.
With regards to pulling a NK forward... I think it's possible...
If I pulled a vote forward from Day 5 ... it would count. If I'm alive Day 5 I have no vote to use... If I'm dead I've already used it.
Why not with NK's ? Though if the SCUM NK is a group action as on my experience they normaly do... it might cause problems. But I just feel that it would mean that SCUM would at some point have no NK