Durp Snark 74: In memory of BrainGlutton

Someone · #1 25th June 2016, 04:48 PM

GO!

Someone · #2 25th June 2016, 04:53 PM

Will the GOP disintegrate before the general election?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/25/politi...arty-election/

Quote:

Conservative commentator and columnist George Will says he is leaving the Republican Party because of Donald Trump -- and he's advocating that others do the same.

In a speech at a Federalist Society luncheon Friday, he told the audience, "This is not my party," according to PJ Media, a conservative news website.

Someone · #3 25th June 2016, 05:43 PM

hi

Someone · #4 25th June 2016, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

GO!

Needs more leafy.

Someone · #5 25th June 2016, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

GO!

Someone · #6 25th June 2016, 06:27 PM

That one had enough leafy.

Someone · #7 25th June 2016, 06:42 PM

For those of us playing the home game, is there a connection between BG and 74?

Someone · #8 25th June 2016, 06:53 PM

Let's do some snark: ZPG fantasizes about whacking random people. What a surprise.

Someone · #9 25th June 2016, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

For those of us playing the home game, is there a connection between BG and 74?

BG is a reference to the German basketball club BG Göttingen who were founded in 1974.

...and göttingen is German for "glutton".

Someone · #10 25th June 2016, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

...and göttingen is German for "glutton".

But what's the German for "Fenris is spooging his pants over this banning"?

ETA: I handed it to Google Translate. It appears to be: "Fenris ist spooging seine Hose über dieses Verbot"

Someone · #11 25th June 2016, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

End of an era. Did not think this was actually going to happen.

I wish I could be in the room when Fenris first sees this.

Yay! At last! Maybe GD and Elections will be readable* again without the Durp's resident spambot

The best part is he was banned for yet another stupid link, rather than an actual argument. Poetic justice at it's best.

*Ok. I don't really expect it to be readable, so how about "less unreadable"?

Someone · #12 25th June 2016, 08:01 PM

This was too good to leave locked up in the other thread, especially since it's been cornfielded:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

WTF???? At least the trolls are getting more sophisticated.

Studies say Black women have the tightest, smallest and strongest vagina's??
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24464469

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20042169

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2593128/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10895030

http://www.justanswer.com/ob-gyn/6d5...-vagina-s.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1283097/

Full vinyl polysiloxane casts of the vagina were obtained from 23 Afro-American, 39 Caucasian and 15 Hispanic women in lying, sitting and standing positions. A new shape, the pumpkin seed, was found in 40% of Afro-American women, but not in Caucasians or Hispanics. Analyses of cast and introital measurements revealed: (1) posterior cast length is significantly longer, anterior cast length is significantly shorter and cast width is significantly larger in Hispanics than in the other two groups and (2) the Caucasian introitus is significantly greater than that of the Afro-American subject.

The pelvic inlet was wider among 178 white women than 56 African-American women (10.7±0.7 cm compared with 10.0.±0.7 cm, P<.001). The outlet was also wider (mean intertuberous diameter 12.3±1.0 cm compared with 11.8±0.9 cm, P<.001). There were no significant differences between racial groups in interspinous diameter, angle of the subpubic arch, anteroposterior conjugate, levator thickness, or levator hiatus. In addition, among women who delivered vaginally without a sphincter tear, African-American women had more pelvic floor mobility than white women. This difference was not observed among women who had sustained an obstetric sphincter tear.

I think torso length and hip width are pretty good determiners for vagina size. It is not the height of of the women (head to foot) which determines the depth of the vagina.
There is definitely a racial difference and also genetic factors which determine the length of vagina. White women give birth to babies with larger heads "on average" so their hips are "on average" broader, and their vaginal opening is also larger. Black women, actually have smaller vagina's. They give birth to babies with smaller heads and have smaller hips. Black women store more body fat on their buttocks, but their hips are actually smaller (men and women). White people also have longer torso's and white women also have longer vagina's. Asian women have shorter vagina's than both black and white women, have wider openings than black women, but not as large as white women. Unlike penis size, the body size/shape of a woman has an influence on vaginal size. Taller women (longer torso) with wider hips will most likely have longer and deeper set vagina. Torso size/length is more significant than actual height. As for men however, a 6' 8" man may have a smaller penis than a 5' 8" man, just like has ears may also be smaller. External organs are not influenced by body size or height, whereas internal organs are.
Thank you

Dr Prabir Kumar Das.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS:

Limited knowledge exists about pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function in ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to compare PFM strength and endurance in a group of black, white and mixed-race women.
METHODS:

This was a cross-sectional study. Maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and endurance were measured with a perineometer and vaginal balloon sensor. Two sets of three MVC of the PFM were recorded; resting phase was 5 min. Demographic variables and factors associated with PFM strength were assessed.
RESULTS:

A total of 122 nulliparous black (n = 44), white (n = 44) and mixed-race (n = 34) students participated. PFM of black women were stronger than that of white (p = 0.02) or mixed-race (p < 0.01) women. The MVC of PFM in black women decreased (p = 0.02) between the first and second set of contractions.

OBJECTIVE:

We calculated incidence rates of urinary incontinence by incontinence frequency and type over 4 years in Asian, black, and white women in the United States.
STUDY DESIGN:

Prospective analyses included 76,724 participants aged 37-79 years in the Nurses' Health Study cohorts with no incontinence at baseline.
RESULTS:

The 4-year incidence of incontinence at least monthly was higher in white women (7.3/100 person-years) compared with Asian (5.7/100 person-years; P = .003) and black women (4.8/100 person-years; P < .001). The incidence of at least weekly stress incontinence was significantly lower in black compared with white women (0.1 vs 0.8 per 100 person-years; P < .001). The difference between black and white women in the incidence of any incontinence and stress incontinence remained significant after adjusting for known risk factors (P < .001 for both).

Objective

To compare the structure and function of the urethral sphincter and the urethral support in nulliparous black and white women.
Methods

Eighteen black women (mean age 28.1 years) and 17 white women (mean age 31.3 years) completed this cross-sectional study. The following assessments were made: urethral function using multichannel cystometrics and urethral pressure profilometry, pelvic muscle strength using an instrumented speculum, urethral mobility using the cotton-swab test and perineal ultrasound, and pelvic muscle bulk using magnetic resonance imaging.
Results

Black women demonstrated a 29% higher average urethral closure pressure during a maximum pelvic muscle contraction (154 cm H2O versus 119 cm H2O in the white subjects; P = .008). Although not statistically significant, black women had a 14% higher maximum urethral closure 23) and pressure at rest (108 cm H2O versus 95 cm H2O; P = a 21% larger urethral volume (4818 mm3 versus 3977 mm3; P = .06). In addition, there was a 36% greater vesical neck mobility measured with the cotton-swab test (blacks 49° versus whites 36°; P = .02) and a 42% difference in ultrasonically measured vesical neck mobility during a maximum Valsalva effort (blacks = −17 mm versus whites −12 mm; P = .08).

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of the study was to compare levator and obturator thickness between asymptomatic black and white nulliparas using three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) color mapping.
STUDY DESIGN:

3D color-mapped MRI of pelvic muscles were evaluated in 22 similar nulliparas (12 black, 10 white). Levator and obturator (OI) were divided into right and left. Levator was subdivided into puborectalis (PR) and ileococcygeus (IC) portions. Maximal thickness of each muscle was recorded and compared between groups. Nonparametric testing was applied, with significance at P = .05.
RESULTS:

Levator thickness was significantly greater in blacks bilaterally (median right PR, 8.5 vs 6.0 mm; P = .001; right IC, 6.5 vs 4.5 mm; P = .002; left PR, 9.5 vs 5.75 mm; P = .0002; left IC, 6.5 vs 5.75 mm; P = .02). Obturator thicknesses were similar (right OI, 20.0 vs 19.5 mm; left OI, 19.25 vs 19.25 mm; P = NS).
CONCLUSION:

Significantly thicker levators but similar obturators were seen in black nulliparas, compared with white nulliparas. These levator differences may influence pelvic floor dysfunction risk. The clinical significance of these findings is under study.

Am I the only one wondering why they are wasting money determining which race of women has tighter vag instead of finding cures for cancer, HIV, and other deadly diseases? But apparently it's more important to know which race of women has tighter poon

Love that last line.

Someone · #13 25th June 2016, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

"Fenris is spooging his pants over this banning"

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Yay! At last!...

See? Told y'all.

Someone · #14 25th June 2016, 08:16 PM

It's a family affair

It's a family affair

Someone · #15 25th June 2016, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Love that last line.

The real mystery is exactly how one goes about asking three dozen women if you can bend them over all in a row and study their pussies. Without getting maced into next week, that is. I hate when that happens.

Someone · #16 25th June 2016, 08:18 PM

They oughta make Fenris an Admin over there. He'd probably fuck up as bad as Marley did, but he'd fuck it up in style! It would probably look better after he got done with it, too! Fenris is our Trump!

Someone · #17 25th June 2016, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Love that last line.

The real mystery is exactly how one goes about asking three dozen women if you can bend them over all in a row and study their pussies. Without getting maced into next week, that is. I hate when that happens.

If you'll take young boys (100 of them!), instead, Starving Artist has your butt!

Someone · #18 25th June 2016, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Love that last line.

The real mystery is exactly how one goes about asking three dozen women if you can bend them over all in a row and study their pussies. Without getting maced into next week, that is. I hate when that happens.

You advertise for medical research subjects. Seriously.

Someone · #19 25th June 2016, 08:33 PM

Fenris, there were a lot of folks who said your constant griping and harping on BrainGlutton was colored by your political leanings. I never figured so, but who am I to play arbiter of your motivations for snark? Still, you may now live on vindicated knowing that even the dope modes finally saw fit to ban his ass.

Someone · #20 25th June 2016, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

You advertise for medical research subjects. Seriously.

I was a medical research subject for a while. For almost a decade, once a year they poked me, prodded me, bled me, and gave me 50 bucks each time.

We need some snark in this thread.

Someone · #21 25th June 2016, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Fenris, there were a lot of folks who said your constant griping and harping on BrainGlutton was colored by your political leanings.

Maybe. I'm just as liberal as BrainFartin is, and I have no problem saying he was an absolute waste of carbon. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Someone · #22 25th June 2016, 09:05 PM

We could burn him. It might even be fun. Burn the bastards on your side. They're even more fun than the idiots from the other side.

Someone · #23 25th June 2016, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Let's do some snark: ZPG fantasizes about whacking random people. What a surprise.

Well, if you have a real zeal for zee pee gee, there's only so much you can do by refraining from reproducing. You need to step up your game a bit to compensate for all those irresponsible fellow citizens who just keep on spawning anyway.

Someone · #24 26th June 2016, 05:16 AM

BigTwat types himself up his own arse yet again

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

If the arguments are such you can't make them here without fear of losing relationships, either your relationships are really fragile or they are really bad. arguments. And if they're that fragile, why worry--they were never your friends anyways.

Someone · #25 26th June 2016, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

For those of us playing the home game, is there a connection between BG and 74?

yes.

A1 = {3, 4, 5, 6} ∧ A2 = {7, 8, 9, 10} ⇒
A1 + A2 = {(3, 1), (4, 1), (5, 1), (6, 1), (7, 2), (8, 2), (9, 2), (10, 2)} = BG/74

BG/74 = Star date - 307484.55

You can clearly see the 74 between the 30 and 84.

Now, 84 - 30 = 54.

54 means the next person banned from the SDMB will have the 6 of the following 9 letters in his name. (9 x 6 = 54)

P S F R E N I J Z

It's pretty clear really.

Someone · #26 26th June 2016, 07:13 AM

Yes, I'll have whatever he's smoking, thank you.

Someone · #27 26th June 2016, 08:14 AM

Start the countdown on boffking.
Jonathan Chance

Quote:

The Moderator Speaks
And this'll earn you a warning, boffking.

I've told you before, multiple times, that starting threads out of forum - or obsessively starting threads on single topics - is no longer an option for you.

Not even moved. Closed.

That's certainly one poster who won't try to return after being banned.

Someone · #28 26th June 2016, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

54 means the next person banned from the SDMB will have the 6 of the following 9 letters in his name. (9 x 6 = 54)

P S F R E N I J Z

It's pretty clear really.

I'm gonna use that as my next sock name! Bet I get banned before I can even finish registering!

Someone · #29 26th June 2016, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I'm gonna use that as my next sock name! Bet I get banned before I can even finish registering!

Huh. Not banned yet. I even posted in ATMB. I wonder how long it will be before one of the modes gets up off their lazy asses and whacks me.

Someone · #30 26th June 2016, 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I'm gonna use that as my next sock name! Bet I get banned before I can even finish registering!

Huh. Not banned yet. I even posted in ATMB. I wonder how long it will be before one of the modes gets up off their lazy asses and whacks me.

Post a link to a pic of Bieber's peen. That will get Idiot Thought's attention.

Someone · #31 26th June 2016, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Start the countdown on boffking.
Jonathan Chance

Quote:

The Moderator Speaks
And this'll earn you a warning, boffking.

I've told you before, multiple times, that starting threads out of forum - or obsessively starting threads on single topics - is no longer an option for you.

Not even moved. Closed.

That's certainly one poster who won't try to return after being banned.

Johnny Chance got trolled and took the bait. Hook, line and sinker.

Someone · #32 26th June 2016, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I'm gonna use that as my next sock name! Bet I get banned before I can even finish registering!

Huh. Not banned yet. I even posted in ATMB. I wonder how long it will be before one of the modes gets up off their lazy asses and whacks me.

You're not even trying lately. Summer doldrums? Lifestyle crisis? Talk about getting off your lazy ass--put some heart into it, man.

Someone · #33 26th June 2016, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Start the countdown on boffking.
Jonathan Chance

Quote:

The Moderator Speaks
And this'll earn you a warning, boffking.

I've told you before, multiple times, that starting threads out of forum - or obsessively starting threads on single topics - is no longer an option for you.

Not even moved. Closed.

That's certainly one poster who won't try to return after being banned.

And now it's the topic of an ATMB discussion.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=796855

Someone · #34 26th June 2016, 09:54 AM

I'm with Jonathan on this one. Boffking is an annoying twit.

Someone · #35 26th June 2016, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I'm gonna use that as my next sock name! Bet I get banned before I can even finish registering!

Huh. Not banned yet. I even posted in ATMB. I wonder how long it will be before one of the modes gets up off their lazy asses and whacks me.

You got disappeared. Can't say they slept through that one. Suck a great user name too.

Someone · #36 26th June 2016, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I'm gonna use that as my next sock name! Bet I get banned before I can even finish registering!

Huh. Not banned yet. I even posted in ATMB. I wonder how long it will be before one of the modes gets up off their lazy asses and whacks me.

Now I'm banninated. Took 'em almost an hour. Lazy fucks.

Someone · #37 26th June 2016, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Huh. Not banned yet. I even posted in ATMB. I wonder how long it will be before one of the modes gets up off their lazy asses and whacks me.

You're not even trying lately. Summer doldrums? Lifestyle crisis? Talk about getting off your lazy ass--put some heart into it, man.

Challenge accepted. Sock made. Find it!

ETA: I will report back as soon as you ban it. IF you find it. Socking at the Durp is so much fun. IP search ain't gonna work, this time.

Someone · #38 26th June 2016, 10:32 AM

You are a strange individual. And I admire that.

Someone · #39 26th June 2016, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

You're not even trying lately. Summer doldrums? Lifestyle crisis? Talk about getting off your lazy ass--put some heart into it, man.

Challenge accepted. Sock made. Find it!

ETA: I will report back as soon as you ban it. IF you find it. Socking at the Durp is so much fun. IP search ain't gonna work, this time.

Gruff?

Someone · #40 26th June 2016, 10:43 AM

Naw, still ain't found it. Get it, boy, get it!

I'll give you something to do on a lazy sunday afternoon.

Someone · #41 26th June 2016, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Huh. Not banned yet. I even posted in ATMB. I wonder how long it will be before one of the modes gets up off their lazy asses and whacks me.

Now I'm banninated. Took 'em almost an hour. Lazy fucks.

It took them more than a full day to find my sock Ersazt Socken. True story.

Someone · #42 26th June 2016, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Now I'm banninated. Took 'em almost an hour. Lazy fucks.

It took them more than a full day to find my sock Ersazt Socken. True story.

Not to find. To work up the energy to ban.

Someone · #43 26th June 2016, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

It took them more than a full day to find my sock Ersazt Socken. True story.

Not to find. To work up the energy to ban.

It's like killing flies. For each fly you kill, 3 come to the funeral. Pretty soon, you're banning posters in your sleep, waking up tired and cranky for all the work you did.

Someone · #44 26th June 2016, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

It took them more than a full day to find my sock Ersazt Socken. True story.

Not to find. To work up the energy to ban.

HEY! NYS flag! You might live as close to me as RealityChuckles.

Someone · #45 26th June 2016, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Huh. Not banned yet. I even posted in ATMB. I wonder how long it will be before one of the modes gets up off their lazy asses and whacks me.

You're not even trying lately. Summer doldrums? Lifestyle crisis? Talk about getting off your lazy ass--put some heart into it, man.

See here's the problem. The Modes that are left don't care that much so they'll ban you when they get the chance. It's not their life's work. If you can't troll them, there's no point.

Someone · #46 26th June 2016, 01:17 PM

DrDurp is hyperventilating through his mouth about BrainGlutton's banning.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...7&postcount=23

Someone · #47 26th June 2016, 01:51 PM

This fucking idiot has his nose so far up the mod's asses over there that the first one to fart will probably explode John Mace's head.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...4&postcount=22

He's so begging to be a mod there. If that ever happens, I'll seriously start socking just to get banned.

Someone · #48 26th June 2016, 08:08 PM

Eh, John's not so bad. He would probably mod like Marley23. I don't want him to be chosen because I like chaos.

Now, if we're choosing from a list of profligate posters, who should we elect mod? Guin? Elucidator? No no no. Big Tard for mod. Yes!

Someone · #49 26th June 2016, 08:26 PM

That would be such a delightful clusterfuck it just might be worth it.

Someone · #50 26th June 2016, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

This fucking idiot has his nose so far up the mod's asses over there that the first one to fart will probably explode John Mace's head.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...4&postcount=22

He's so begging to be a mod there. If that ever happens, I'll seriously start socking just to get banned.

Snark fail. John Mace is a goodfella.

Here is the real way to do it: the person with the most posts in a particular forum is by default the moderator. If they refuse to moderate god bless 'em. Anyone who doesn't like the moderation can post more.