Go Back   The Giraffe Boards > The Dump > The Box
Register Blogs GB FAQ Forum Rules Community Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 3rd February 2021, 11:23 PM
Xen Master Xen Master is offline
In the Box Forever
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 127
Why exactly are custodial parents legally allowed to refuse to seek child support if the best interests of the CHILD should come first?

Why exactly are custodial parents legally allowed to refuse to seek child support if the best interests of the CHILD should come first?

Also, why exactly don't children have a legal recourse for such a move on the part of their custodial parents--for instance, by being allowed to sue their custodial parents for this (as in, for not giving them as good of a childhood as they could have by depriving them of additional child support) once these children themselves will become adults? For that matter, why exactly aren't children--once they will become adults--also sue their non-custodial parents for this if their non-custodial parents were actually in on this scam? Sure, forcing non-custodial parents to pay 18+ years' worth of retroactive child support would destroy their lives, but who the fuck really cares, right? The best interests of the CHILD come first!
Reply With Quote
 

Giraffiti
lobotomies get them home, Troll Booth


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.7 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Management has discontinued messages until further notice.