Government Shutdown

[Brian]

Originally Posted by rayh

Well the last one in 1995, orchestrated by the republicans, cost $2.1 billion. Cite.

You're downright funny, if you think that RT is a reliable cite for anything. It's a propaganda agency, funded by the Russian government.

P.S. I suppose it's too much to ask why leftists like you and mswas continually quote it?

[rayh]

Originally Posted by Brian

You're downright funny, if you think that RT is a reliable cite for anything. It's a propaganda agency, funded by the Russian government.

P.S. I suppose it's too much to ask why leftists like you and mswas continually quote it?

Cite that the figure quoted is wrong.

[Brian]

Originally Posted by rayh

Cite that the figure quoted is wrong.

You made the claim, it's up to you to prove its veracity.

[rayh]

Originally Posted by Brian

You made the claim, it's up to you to prove its veracity.

It's true, I made the claim. I produced a cite to back up my claim. You dispute the accuarcy of my cite. It is up to you to disprove it or provide a better cite.

[Brian]

Originally Posted by rayh

It's true, I made the claim. I produced a cite to back up my claim. You dispute the accuarcy of my cite. It is up to you to disprove it or provide a better cite.

No, it's actually not. RT doesn't provide any substantiation for their "facts". I simply don't believe them, and if you were an honest poster, neither would you.

[rayh]

Originally Posted by Brian

No, it's actually not. RT doesn't provide any substantiation for their "facts". I simply don't believe them, and if you were an honest poster, neither would you.

Just saying you don't belive them is not good enough. Either disprove or provide another cite. Otherwise you are just bullshitting. Put up or shut up.

[Brian]

Originally Posted by rayh

Just saying you don't belive them is not good enough. Either disprove or provide another cite. Otherwise you are just bullshitting. Put up or shut up.

That's not how it works, on the internet. You can't just throw up a website link and expect it to stick. Your "cite" needs to be reasonable and reliable. RT is neither. But it says a lot about you, for quoting it.

[Xploder]

Originally Posted by Brian

No, it's actually not. RT doesn't provide any substantiation for their "facts". I simply don't believe them, and if you were an honest poster, neither would you.

Right there folks. Right there is why arguing with this moronic asshole is beyond pointless. "I don't believe it so it isn't true. I'm not listening to you. La-la-la-la-la." ad nauseum.

While it may be fun to poke the troll with a stick it's starting to become sort of cruel - like holding a cookie juuuuust out of a four year old's reach.