Go Back   The Giraffe Boards > Main > Arts and Entertainment
Register Blogs GB FAQ Forum Rules Community Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th February 2011, 07:54 AM
Tripler's Avatar
Tripler Tripler is offline
РУССКИЙ ВОЕННЫЙ КОРАБЛЬ, ИДИ НАХУЙ!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: OL-LANL (Los Alamos)
Posts: 2,665
Blog Entries: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shot From Guns View Post
I find it hilarious that you're able to speak the words "new Star Trek" and "get the physics right" in the same breath.
Well, c'mon now. . . it is called "science fiction." For a good tale, you have to have serious credibility with each, individual term.

Tripler
I mean, who doesn't love a good,accurately-depicted phaser fight?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16th February 2011, 09:39 AM
Shot From Guns's Avatar
Shot From Guns Shot From Guns is offline
The Best Ruiner
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripler View Post
Well, c'mon now. . . it is called "science fiction." For a good tale, you have to have serious credibility with each, individual term.
There's fictional physics that legitimately allows you to suspend disbelieve (e.g., transporters), and there's fictional physics that's just retarded (e.g., a supernova crumbles a planet in a completely different solar system, with no warning and no travel time for the blast wave, so that no one can evacuate... although somehow Spock knew it was going to happen in time for the Vulcan Science Academy to outfit him with a ship with enough "red matter" to probably destroy the entire quadrant).

Which isn't to say it wasn't a fun film. I liked it a lot. I just have no illusions about how retarded a lot of the science (and plot) was.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th February 2011, 02:16 PM
Lazlo's Avatar
Lazlo Lazlo is offline
In the closet by request
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shot From Guns View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripler View Post
Well, c'mon now. . . it is called "science fiction." For a good tale, you have to have serious credibility with each, individual term.
There's fictional physics that legitimately allows you to suspend disbelieve (e.g., transporters), and there's fictional physics that's just retarded (e.g., a supernova crumbles a planet in a completely different solar system, with no warning and no travel time for the blast wave, so that no one can evacuate... although somehow Spock knew it was going to happen in time for the Vulcan Science Academy to outfit him with a ship with enough "red matter" to probably destroy the entire quadrant).

Which isn't to say it wasn't a fun film. I liked it a lot. I just have no illusions about how retarded a lot of the science (and plot) was.
Well, as Tripler made perfectly obvious, he was only talking about the opening scene. Hell, even Phil Plait agrees with that.

I agree that the rest of the movie's physics is horrible beyond belief, but that matters not a whit to what once again, Tripler actually said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripler
The opening scene from the new Star Trek. Part the emotion and action, part the cinematography (I know half of it's CGI), and most of it is that they get the physics right!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th February 2011, 09:01 AM
Shot From Guns's Avatar
Shot From Guns Shot From Guns is offline
The Best Ruiner
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazlo View Post
Well, as Tripler made perfectly obvious, he was only talking about the opening scene.
Yes, the opening scene was well done. That doesn't change the fact that a lot of the rest of the "science" in the film was just abyssmally wrong to the point of being fucking retarded. Thus my amusement at someone being able to talk at all about Star Trek getting physics right.

It wasn't intended as an attack--simply a wryly bemused observation.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th February 2011, 03:05 PM
Lazlo's Avatar
Lazlo Lazlo is offline
In the closet by request
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shot From Guns View Post
It wasn't intended as an attack--simply a wryly bemused observation.
I realized that in retrospect. Again, sorry about that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24th February 2011, 01:18 PM
Shot From Guns's Avatar
Shot From Guns Shot From Guns is offline
The Best Ruiner
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazlo View Post
I realized that in retrospect. Again, sorry about that.
NOOOOOO, FFFFFFFFUCK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th March 2011, 06:35 AM
Clothahump's Avatar
Clothahump Clothahump is offline
In the Box Forever
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shot From Guns View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazlo View Post
Well, as Tripler made perfectly obvious, he was only talking about the opening scene.
Yes, the opening scene was well done. That doesn't change the fact that a lot of the rest of the "science" in the film was just abyssmally wrong to the point of being fucking retarded. Thus my amusement at someone being able to talk at all about Star Trek getting physics right.
Well, even blind hogs find an occasional acorn.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th March 2011, 02:20 PM
detop detop is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 10 klicks past nowhere
Posts: 242
Two scenes from Battle of Britain :
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12th March 2011, 04:11 PM
The Superhero's Avatar
The Superhero The Superhero is offline
I Whupped Batman's Ass
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Coolest Small Town in America
Posts: 4,713
One that just occurred to me recently: Superman rescuing Lois Lane from the helicopter crash in the first Superman, still the best superhero movie based on a comic book.*

One of the best first-meeting dialogue exchanges between two characters ever: "Easy, miss, I've got you." (disbelieving look) "You've got me?! Who's got you?!"

Then Superman catches the falling helicopter in one hand, the crowd goes nuts and John Williams hits the perfect, "Of course he caught the helicopter, he's motherfucking SUPERMAN!" note...

Damn, I love that scene. The whole "Superman does superheroic deeds" sequence that follows is great, but the whole helicopter crash and rescue scene is one of my favorites ever.

I would have loved just one scene even half that great in Superman Returns. Alas, it was not to be.

* Not, however, the best overall superhero movie ever, thanks to the existence of The Incredibles.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16th February 2011, 06:00 PM
Tripler's Avatar
Tripler Tripler is offline
РУССКИЙ ВОЕННЫЙ КОРАБЛЬ, ИДИ НАХУЙ!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: OL-LANL (Los Alamos)
Posts: 2,665
Blog Entries: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shot From Guns View Post
Which isn't to say it wasn't a fun film. I liked it a lot. I just have no illusions about how retarded a lot of the science (and plot) was.
Now I understand where you're coming from, and agree with you completely. The "tactical science" is good, and that's what I enjoy. Hell, there were plot holes in BSG too that were shaky at best, but the gunfights made up for those.

Tripler
Yeah! Die toaster, die!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Giraffiti
badtz for sure now, Debbie Does Dallas, milfs in heat #23 scene 6, SPARTAAAA!! Oh... sorry., The Man hurring durr, The Man's a culo, The Man's cool, when he's refrigerated


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.7 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Management has discontinued messages until further notice.