Go Back   The Giraffe Boards > Main > Just the Facts
Register Blogs GB FAQ Forum Rules Community Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10th April 2010, 10:18 AM
GIGObuster's Avatar
GIGObuster GIGObuster is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 733
Blog Entries: 1
Apollo 13 math formula used in the movie and a slide rule question

From this movie error site:

http://www.moviemistakes.com/film75/...ns?viewall=yes
Quote:
As the Apollo 13 crew is readying to "slingshot" around the back of the moon, burn calculations are being made by Houston which are relayed to the crew. Tom Hanks is calculating total fuel amounts in the various fuel tanks by mathematical addition using a slide rule. You don't add and subtract with a slide rule. You multiply and divide.
[Wrong - the only time a slide rule is seen is when the crew are transferring from the Command Module to the Lunar Module and they need to convert the gimbal angles. Lovell (Hanks) is attempting to work out the conversions using pencil and paper. He asks for confirmation that he has got the figures right. At this point we see one of the flight controllers using a slide rule to check the calculations, which DO involve multiplication and division].
[Wrong again - the slide rule is being used when transferring the gimbal angles from the CM to the LM. (The offsets between the two would have been measured earlier in the flight.) The LM angles are the three CM angles with the offsets added or taken away. No multiplication or division are involved]
Well, who is right over there regarding the slide rule use?

Also, I had a hard time finding the formula and the math used in the movie, I need it to possibly show students in my class how math can save one's skin in an emergency.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10th April 2010, 04:10 PM
Lazlo's Avatar
Lazlo Lazlo is offline
In the closet by request
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,928
Hmm. I'm a slide rule collector and and an Apollo 13 fan, so I know the scene of which you speak.

First of all, addition and subtraction are not performed on a slide rule. Simple multiplication and division is usually easier without the rule as well. Eg. you won't use a slide rule for 12/4 or 9*7 (but you could!). Depending on the complexity of the slide rule, you can use them to calculate trigonometric functions, squares, cubes, and their respective roots. There were also special slide rules for electronics that did those imaginary calculations for AC power and whatnot.

Now as far as the scene on Apollo 13 is concerned, I distinctly remember thinking, "Why would mission control use a slide rule for addition and subtraction?" The worksheet that Lovell was shown scribbling on had definite + and - operators on it, and from what I understand, the gimbal conversions were indeed simple addition and subtraction. I chalked it up to that whole artistic-license thing. There was no need for a slide rule in that scene.

Unfortunately, I'm visiting my folks so I don't have access to my Apollo 13 DVD to double check.

Now, just because I'm rambling on about stuff I like, you might be interested to know that the entire crew of Apollo 13 carried a Pickett N600-ES pocket slide rule on every mission. The really neat thing about these is that there are still hundreds of new-old stock available and it's a cheap piece of Apollo history (Yep! I have one!).

Here are a couple of very informative links about slide rules and how to use them:

http://sliderulemuseum.com/SR_Course.htm

http://www.sliderule.ca/intro.htm

Anyhow, I'm sorry I don't have the exact formula for gimbal conversion available for you, but I'm 99% sure it's just an offset you'd add or subtract.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10th April 2010, 05:12 PM
timbicile's Avatar
timbicile timbicile is offline
targetforfarawaylaughter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rock City
Posts: 6,430
Send a message via Yahoo to timbicile
Gigo, I always try to interact with you but you make it difficult.
Lazlo, I have never heard of a nerdier hobby. ::bows::
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10th April 2010, 07:20 PM
Lazlo's Avatar
Lazlo Lazlo is offline
In the closet by request
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,928
I try!

Even though my grammar is so bad that I use the wrong tense sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th April 2010, 07:53 PM
GIGObuster's Avatar
GIGObuster GIGObuster is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 733
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazlo View Post
I try!

Even though my grammar is so bad that I use the wrong tense sometimes.
Oh don't worry about that!

There is a reason why I told my principal that I could teach almost anything, except teaching English. Besides being my second language, even I can see that my English grammar is a crime against nature.

In any case, thank you for your reply. As it is a high school class, I think it will be OK if it is a simple formula (it will be a throw away exercise when talking about the moon and the exploration of it), but I have still not found what formula and values they used.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th April 2010, 08:15 PM
Lazlo's Avatar
Lazlo Lazlo is offline
In the closet by request
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,928
I think I found a similar checklist page from Apollo 15. Check page 55 of this huge PDF.

I don't know if those are for the gimbal conversions or if it's for something else. There are a lot of acronyms I'm not familar with.

There are links to many more PDFs here. I'm going to peruse through the LM Operations Handbook. That sucker is 37 megs!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10th April 2010, 09:45 PM
Tuckerfan's Avatar
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ralph's Camp
Posts: 5,163
Send a message via AIM to Tuckerfan
The subject has come up on The Bad Astronomer's forum in the past, but their search engine is so wonky that finding it is probably going to be difficult. I'm sure, however, that if you post your question over there, you'll not only get an answer as to what they were doing in the film, but also what they were really doing on the Apollo 13 mission (and the innumerable debates as to which type of slide rule is superior).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11th April 2010, 11:08 AM
Lazlo's Avatar
Lazlo Lazlo is offline
In the closet by request
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,928
Good call on that, Tuckerfan. I'm searching their forums right now and I even ran into a few of your posts so far.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11th April 2010, 11:17 AM
wring's Avatar
wring wring is offline
The Cat's Ass
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 12,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazlo View Post
Good call on that, Tuckerfan. I'm searching their forums right now and I even ran into a few of your posts so far.
I think Snookie used to post there, too. He stopped for the most part 'cause he found it difficult to cull his humor to "appropriate for the family and children" all the time. PM me if you want to know his screenname. (I'm the only one who really calls him Snookie - oh, and folks I work w/'cause that's how I refer to him all the time)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12th April 2010, 05:16 AM
BJMoose BJMoose is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 19,623
I'm looking at Lost Moon, p. 130 to see what Lovell had to say about this. I'm not sure. The text suggests that he had to deal with more than roll-pitch-yaw angle conversions (wouldn't the roll angle be the same when the vehicles were docked?). One could look at the com transcript to see what sort of numbers Lovell passed down to Mission Control. I had a copy, but the hard drive on the other computer ate it a few days back. . . .

Regarding Lovell's sudden math skills paranoia, it says: "Could he perform the calculations properly? Would his ciphering be correct? 3 times 5 is 15, isn't it? 175 minus 82 is 93, isn't it? With the clock ticking down, Lovell all at once found himself doubting his ability to add and subtract." So maybe multiplication was involved. Or maybe this is just loose language indicating that he didn't trust himself with even basic math skills.

In any case, I'm sure Ron Howard saw this scene as an opportunity to put a little "obsolete technology" on display, even if it wasn't appropiate to that particular scene. Maybe they didn't use a slide rule on this occasion, but the trajectory guys in the Trench certainly gave their slide rules a good workout over the course of a flight.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12th April 2010, 06:10 AM
Lazlo's Avatar
Lazlo Lazlo is offline
In the closet by request
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by wring View Post
I think Snookie used to post there, too. He stopped for the most part 'cause he found it difficult to cull his humor to "appropriate for the family and children" all the time. PM me if you want to know his screenname. (I'm the only one who really calls him Snookie - oh, and folks I work w/'cause that's how I refer to him all the time)
Will do if I start posting there! I'm done with the site for now, though. I've skimmed through enough Apollo threads to get weary of the subject. GIGO, if you want to find (or ask) your question there, you're on your own, buddy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BJMoose View Post
Maybe they didn't use a slide rule on this occasion, but the trajectory guys in the Trench certainly gave their slide rules a good workout over the course of a flight.
I have no doubt about that! You know, now I'm starting to wonder if there wouldn't be some trigonometry involved in making those angle conversions. Gah, this is going to be in my head for a while.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.7 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Management has discontinued messages until further notice.