Quote:
Originally Posted by Total Ulla
Where is all the talking?
If we have Nights and are allowed to talk - I think it would be nice if we made the best of it  |
ok i'll ask a question just to see if anyone is paying attention.
for the folks who voted for
skeezy before he claimed or the folks that kept their vote on him after he claimed, why?
i mean was it because of the half assed nature of his pm quotingg? is it because his claim was unbelievable? was it because you just didn't buy it?
and certainly claiming is not a get out of jail free card by any means. see the current game on
idle's board where two claimed investigators have been lynched in a row. both being scum. and to a great extent both were kind of concensus lynches. the second one being a landslide (i guess after you lynch your first claimed investigator it makes just that much more sense to lynch a second).
the other question i have for the crowd. in fifty words or less give me the reason some folks have the position of "we have to lynch a claimed miller". and some folks even go so far as to suggest that this be done post haste. i mean if you believe the claim then that is a lynch of a townie which i obviously don't get. and to some extent as a miller you know that this is going to be the default of at least a couple of folks, if not a plurality or majority. so to some extent i believe
romanic's claim. if i believe his claim then i also believe him to be town. ipso fucto, i don't want to lynch him. but other folks seem to think that lynching him is as good an idea as has ever been hatched. that just seems to be a nice easy "policy" vote for scum since they would know him to not be one of them.