NINETY-nine and forty-FOUR 100ths % pure Durp Snark

Someone · #1 2nd January 2018, 04:09 PM

Because I don't get the John Mace one either and this is pretty much perfect. That's why.

Also, FPB

Someone · #2 2nd January 2018, 04:17 PM

Also...Thelmaspew fucks up another forum with her insatiable obsession with Trump.. And the mods (of course) won't move it or warn her for polluting CS with a clear political rant.

Also, dumb Trump (or Obama, or Bush, or Clinton etc) intentional misspellings are just a sign of a weak mind. But misspelling his name "thump" like she does is (and there's no other word for it) retarded...thumping retarded.

Someone · #3 2nd January 2018, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Also...Thelmaspew fucks up another forum with her insatiable obsession with Trump.. And the mods (of course) won't move it or warn her for polluting CS with a clear political rant.

Also, dumb Trump (or Obama, or Bush, or Clinton etc) intentional misspellings are just a sign of a weak mind. But misspelling his name "thump" like she does is (and there's no other word for it) retarded...thumping retarded.

To be fair, Jim's Son is just as retarded. Maybe we could lock them in a room together and let them duke it out?

Someone · #4 2nd January 2018, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Also...Thelmaspew fucks up another forum with her insatiable obsession with Trump.. And the mods (of course) won't move it or warn her for polluting CS with a clear political rant.

Also, dumb Trump (or Obama, or Bush, or Clinton etc) intentional misspellings are just a sign of a weak mind. But misspelling his name "thump" like she does is (and there's no other word for it) retarded...thumping retarded.

To be fair, Jim's Son is just as retarded. Maybe we could lock them in a room together and let them duke it out?

Because they might get it on and have kids.

Someone · #5 2nd January 2018, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

To be fair, Jim's Son is just as retarded. Maybe we could lock them in a room together and let them duke it out?

Because they might get it on and have kids.

Isn't ThelmaLou close to 70? Having kids seems unlikely.

Someone · #6 2nd January 2018, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Also...Thelmaspew fucks up another forum with her insatiable obsession with Trump..

She's a very serious political knowledge person. In 2016 she wanted to know how presidential debates are scored by the refs.

Someone · #7 3rd January 2018, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Also...Thelmaspew fucks up another forum with her insatiable obsession with Trump.. And the mods (of course) won't move it or warn her for polluting CS with a clear political rant.

Also, dumb Trump (or Obama, or Bush, or Clinton etc) intentional misspellings are just a sign of a weak mind. But misspelling his name "thump" like she does is (and there's no other word for it) retarded...thumping retarded.

I'm glad that bothers someone else, because it makes me all

every time I see it. Not only is it just plain silly, it makes no sense. It's not an insult or swearword. I haven't particularly noticed Trump thumping people or things, or getting thumped. It's nothing but "hurr this word is one letter different from the name of a guy I don't like so I'll call him that I'm so clever!" and it gets me all aggravated

Unless she happens to know that Trump thumps his foot like Thumper when Mrs. Thumper twiddles his ear and I'm derailing this train of thought right now.

Someone · #8 2nd January 2018, 04:41 PM

That's a good clean title.

Someone · #9 2nd January 2018, 04:45 PM

Ah, a reference to Marilyn Chambers.
Porn thread. Porn thread!

Someone · #10 2nd January 2018, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Ah, a reference to Marilyn Chambers.
Porn thread. Porn thread!

You're welcome.

Someone · #11 2nd January 2018, 05:11 PM

That link is a bit Fenrised.

Someone · #12 2nd January 2018, 05:38 PM

The snark is weak. "This fifty year old movie is oddly prescient" is fine.

Someone · #13 3rd January 2018, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

The snark is weak. "This fifty year old movie is oddly prescient" is fine.

I dunno. I've never seen a warning for starting a thread in the wrong forum, but if someone launched one claiming that 101 Dalmatians was the perfect allegory for teh Killary!!1!, it would probably have been moved or closed by now.

Someone · #14 2nd January 2018, 05:38 PM

Where's the porn thread?

Someone · #15 3rd January 2018, 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Where's the porn thread?

8===D (*)

Someone · #16 3rd January 2018, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Where's the porn thread?

Thanks to Rule 34, every thread is a porn thread.

Someone · #17 2nd January 2018, 06:43 PM

Does this mean Ahunter3 is giving up on his gender obsession and is on to something different?

Someone · #18 2nd January 2018, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Does this mean Ahunter3 is giving up on his gender obsession and is on to something different?

I would say no.

Quote:

This is a blog about being genderqueer. The relevance of all this is that oppressor guilt is not our friend; straight cisgender people are not our enemy, nor should our communication with them be geared towards shaming them and holding them personally responsible for our situation. Most of them don't understand what we have to go through, except to the extent that we explain it and they choose to listen. Even then they may not get it. And it may threaten them, threaten their existing ways of understanding sexuality and gender and so on. They're going to ask dense and annoying questions. Often. Their fears will drive them to distort what we've said and twist its implications into ridiculous interpretations. It's going to continue to piss us off.

Someone · #19 3rd January 2018, 01:17 AM

I don't get the thread title.

Someone · #20 3rd January 2018, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I don't get the thread title.

It's a hilarious take on the Ivory soap purity claim.

Someone · #21 3rd January 2018, 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I don't get the thread title.

I think it's Ivory Soap.

** searches **

Ivory SNOW actually.

Someone · #22 3rd January 2018, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I don't get the thread title.

Ivory soap ads claim their product to be 99 44/100 pure. (So pure it floats)

They don't tell you that the 56/100 part is comprised of material collected from a leper's runny syphilitic sores.

Someone · #23 3rd January 2018, 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I don't get the thread title.

I think it's Ivory Soap.

** searches **

Ivory SNOW actually.

Ivory soap, too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Ivory soap ads claim their product to be 99 44/100 pure. (So pure it floats)

We all float down here. You'll float, too! 👺

Someone · #24 3rd January 2018, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I think it's Ivory Soap.

** searches **

Ivory SNOW actually.

Ivory soap, too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Ivory soap ads claim their product to be 99 44/100 pure. (So pure it floats)

We all float down here. You'll float, too! ��

Floaters.

Someone · #25 4th January 2018, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

I don't get the thread title.

Ivory soap ads claim their product to be 99 44/100 pure. (So pure it floats)

They don't tell you that the 56/100 part is comprised of material collected from a leper's runny syphilitic sores.

Do they ever explain pure what?

Someone · #26 4th January 2018, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Ivory soap ads claim their product to be 99 44/100 pure. (So pure it floats)

They don't tell you that the 56/100 part is comprised of material collected from a leper's runny syphilitic sores.

Do they ever explain pure what?

Pure soap.

Quote:

Ivory's first slogan, "It Floats!", was introduced in 1891. The product's other well-known slogan, "99 44⁄100% Pure" (in use by 1895), was based on the results of an analysis by an independent laboratory the other founder's son, Harley Procter, hired to demonstrate that Ivory was purer than the castile soap then available.

Remember, in those days there was no guarantee of purity or that a product even contained the ingredients it claimed to contain.

Someone · #27 4th January 2018, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Ivory soap ads claim their product to be 99 44/100 pure. (So pure it floats)

They don't tell you that the 56/100 part is comprised of material collected from a leper's runny syphilitic sores.

Do they ever explain pure what?

Soap.

The rest is Fenris scrapings and giraffe cum.

Someone · #28 4th January 2018, 07:14 PM

And Marilyn Chambers was NOT the baby on the Ivory Soap package, that's just an urban myth.

She was the Mom holding the baby on the Ivory Soap package.

Someone · #29 3rd January 2018, 04:44 AM

It's also a song.

Someone · #30 3rd January 2018, 04:50 AM

Back to the sewer with thee!

..

Someone · #31 3rd January 2018, 04:52 AM

Arrrrrgh, earworm.

...don't worry, even if things end up a bit too heavy, we'll all float on all right already we'll all float on all right...

Someone · #32 3rd January 2018, 04:59 AM

Now that's in my ear too but it's the best song of the 2000's so that's okay.

Someone · #33 3rd January 2018, 05:25 AM

Tardcasm is emotionally broken by noted idiot SamuelA ignoring/not responding to him (start around post 215 or so)

Someone · #34 3rd January 2018, 06:11 AM

Fenris fenrised the link. This goes to the post in question (on page five, F linked to page 2

)

Someone · #35 3rd January 2018, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Fenris fenrised the link.

How many links would a Fenris fenris if a Fenris could fenris links?

Someone · #36 3rd January 2018, 07:23 AM

SamuelA is low hanging fruit. Snarking him should be left for people still on chapter 1 of the Snark handbook. Shame on you Fenris.

Meanwhile, did Marilyn Chambers ever do snark?

Someone · #37 3rd January 2018, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

SamuelA is low hanging fruit. Snarking him should be left for people still on chapter 1 of the Snark handbook. Shame on you Fenris.

Meanwhile, did Marilyn Chambers ever do snark?

He was s ~~weakly~~ snarking on Tardchasm.

Someone · #38 3rd January 2018, 07:23 AM

Is it bothering anyone else that 44/100 should really be expressed 11/25?

Do you even math, bro?

Someone · #39 3rd January 2018, 08:59 AM

And Shags continues to troll:

Quote:

I was just fighting with my Jewish heiress ex-girlfriend online. She is irrational (that goes without saying)

So the question is, what is the reason that comment is wrong? Is she irrational because she's Jewish or is it because she's a woman? When someone has as much bigotry as Shags does, they really need to make it clear which one they're expressing at any given time.

Someone · #40 3rd January 2018, 09:11 AM

She's not 99 and 44/100% pure because then she would be rational

Someone · #41 3rd January 2018, 09:22 AM

why are we already in a new thread

Someone · #42 3rd January 2018, 09:23 AM

Because Fenris.

Someone · #43 3rd January 2018, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

why are we already in a new thread

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Because Fenris.

Countdown to expecto head explosion...

Someone · #44 3rd January 2018, 09:43 AM

Nah, that's an excuse that's pretty easy to accept, actually...

Someone · #45 3rd January 2018, 09:59 AM

3 2 1

Someone · #46 3rd January 2018, 10:08 AM

I like that Shags keeps bringing up how boring he is as a reason he's obviously telling the truth. "I'm not creative/imaginative enough to make stuff up"... yeah, dude, we know you aren't creative. His stories are boring as shit and they're all very slight variations on the same fucking thing. He's by far the most boring, tedious person in his thread, which should have died weeks ago.

Someone · #47 3rd January 2018, 10:23 AM

That's why I find it so fascinating, really. It's boring, his beliefs on what is exciting are boring, his storytelling is boring; yet the thread won't die. I mean, seriously, his idea of 'exciting date', because he won't do anything 'boring', is: go-karts, 'Ride the Ducks!', a casino, and several other rather mundane things. I do find it interesting that he goes on about how he has to really talk to the other person because that's important and no fooling around for at least 3 dates, yet all his ideas for dates are places where one on one conversation can't really happen. There is probably some base kernel of truth to everything he says, but it's so overly fertilized that the roots rot and all we're left with is a guy so out of touch he could sue Hall & Oates for writing about him.

Someone · #48 3rd January 2018, 10:49 AM

On top of all of that is the constantly contradictory narrative of what he's looking for "I'm tired of constantly seeing so many 10s, I just want to have a girlfriend" "I don't want a relationship!", peppered with "gosh I know I should just put XYZ on the bench but I just can't help but make bad choices! gee shucks!" "I don't even know why I put XYZ on the bench to begin with!"

Wowsers, such a wild, bad boy. So exciting. So... I need a nap. I got bored just paraphrasing him.

Someone · #49 3rd January 2018, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

That's why I find it so fascinating, really. It's boring, his beliefs on what is exciting are boring, his storytelling is boring; yet the thread won't die. I mean, seriously, his idea of 'exciting date', because he won't do anything 'boring', is: go-karts, 'Ride the Ducks!', a casino, and several other rather mundane things. I do find it interesting that he goes on about how he has to really talk to the other person because that's important and no fooling around for at least 3 dates, yet all his ideas for dates are places where one on one conversation can't really happen. There is probably some base kernel of truth to everything he says, but it's so overly fertilized that the roots rot and all we're left with is a guy so out of touch he could sue Hall & Oates for writing about him.

Thanks for the earworm. That's O.K. I love me some Hall & Oates. 😎

Someone · #50 3rd January 2018, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

Quote:

Originally Posted by Someone

That's why I find it so fascinating, really. It's boring, his beliefs on what is exciting are boring, his storytelling is boring; yet the thread won't die. I mean, seriously, his idea of 'exciting date', because he won't do anything 'boring', is: go-karts, 'Ride the Ducks!', a casino, and several other rather mundane things. I do find it interesting that he goes on about how he has to really talk to the other person because that's important and no fooling around for at least 3 dates, yet all his ideas for dates are places where one on one conversation can't really happen. There is probably some base kernel of truth to everything he says, but it's so overly fertilized that the roots rot and all we're left with is a guy so out of touch he could sue Hall & Oates for writing about him.

Thanks for the earworm. That's O.K. I love me some Hall & Oates. 😎

Here, have Fernando by ABBA instead.