#51
|
||||
|
||||
Goodbye Colby
Why would you allow me to waste my investigation last night? Really Anti-Town. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Please, Please Explain how you think you were being Towny and allowed that to happen. I'm honestly kind of off at the moment. It's SO scummy at this point it's not even funny
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
I think I should investigate you toNight then, see if the feeling's mutual. |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
It does seem like Colby does not know his name.
Vote colby |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
Something is also up in Noah's world...
With claims of "Ark" from Swammi (confirmed by death), McGinty, Lightfoot, SisterCoyote and Bufftabby, we have an issue... 1. Bufftabby got no result on Lightfoot N1, and vice-versa. Both investigations cannot have been tampered with so it's safe to say that they do not share surnames. 2. McGinty investigated Lightfoot N2 and got no result. Since McGinty got a result on Swammi N1, Lightfoot must not share surnames with McGinty and Swammi OR the scum spent their sole investigation blocking this one 3. Lightfoot investigated SisterC last night and got no result, again presumably different last name OR the scum spent their sole investigation blocking this one Any way, the Ark group is interesting as Lightfoot appears to have no potential pair from the current claimants: someone is lying about a result, they attracted the only scum investigation - which is curious itself, or there's another hidden Ark... |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Scathach, no comments on my issues with your lack of a result on Texcat?
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If texcat IS scum then it was quite a good ploy, jump in as soon as someone has revealed a name, then fake claim a town investigation on someone. Bill being killed N0 would tie in to that neatly since the last thing a scum Texcat wants is lots of people running around with the same name as her. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
Since we've pretty much got Colby dead to rights, I'm wondering who else we should look at. Guiri raises a good point about Lightfoot, and also the Texcat situation.
Hm. For now: but I'll probably come back and change that later. |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
I think that's a hammer.
|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
What do you think about the points I make about the Arks?
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
I think you may be on to something, but I need to go back and see if we've got everyone's name. I'm not sure if we do; I thought there were a couple of holdouts besides me yesterDay.
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
Well, Colby, who presumably we´ll see in a short time, and the only other one is Visorslash, who I suspect is also scum. Hey there @Visorslash, catching up slowly?
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Claimed Arks: Heterometrus swammerdammi, Mrs. McGinty, Sister Coyote, bufftabby, Lightfoot Mrs. McGinty investigated Heterometrus N1, got a Town result Swammi investigated Mrs. McGinty N2, but got NK'd before he could share his result Sister Coyote investigated bufftabby N2, got a Town result Lightfoot has been investigated by both bufftabby and Mrs. McGinty with no result The two most suspicious characters in this play are Mrs. McGinty and Sister Coyote. If Mrs. McGinty is scum, she could have lied about her investigations of both Swammi and Lightfoot -- the scum would have had no choice but to NK Swammi to cover her tracks once the idea of reciprocal investigations was proposed. Similarly, a scum Sister could have fake-claimed an investigation result on bufftabby to try to snuggle up to her and make up for her late name claim. Obviously, bufftabby should investigate Sister toNight. Scum may have hoped to keep Sister alive with a bufftabby NK, so if that happens I'd argue we lynch Sister toMorrow regardless. |
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Unanimous bandwagons make me leery. Also, no sense rushing this. |
#66
|
||||
|
||||
Isn't Day over thanks to SisC?
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
The day has been hammered. However I am at work and can't close the day for a few more hours. Colby please consider yourself dead. I will post a reveal once I get home tonight.
|
#68
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
On the other hand, with Swammi looking quite clearly townie, and also being highly active in organising everyone else, it might still have seemed a good idea to claim a successful scan before bumping him off. Of course, I know that that's not the case, and that the scum will have seen me as potential lynch-bait today, what with me being a relative unknown around here and having given what was a completely unexplained and apparently nonsensical breadcrumb. I saw all of this coming, which is why I posted my explanation as soon as possible this morning. Indeed, the only reason I waited that long was in case I was mistaken and the scum chose to kill someone else for some reason I'd failed to anticipate. Should 'the most convoluted breadcrumb ever' push me down the suspect list or up? That's for y'all to decide. I'll argue my innocence to the last, but I've been around the block enough times not to throw a hissy fit at anyone who votes against me on this basis. All I'd ask is that people read my posts as they're written, and don't allow confirmation bias to make them think I'm 'flinching', 'squirming', 'flailing', or 'panicking'. Even if I was scum, I wouldn't be doing that (most likely, I'd hardly have been posting at all - where is Visorslash, btw?) |
#69
|
||||
|
||||
Visor's been following along, hasn't posted since N1 but was recently reading D3 thread, unless his account's been hacked... That's why I mentioned him earlier...
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
Probably scum, then.
|
#71
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I've updated Lightfoot's table. I think we should continue the reverse investigations of the town results: Scathach should investigate me again. Bufftabby should investigate SisC. But I don't know what the rest of us should do. |
#72
|
||||
|
||||
Is it possible to investigate dead players? Could I investigate BillMc tonight? And get a town result if we have the same name?
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
We're getting down to the End of the RIP investigations. Maybe tonight is our night!
![]() So I propose for tonight one of two things: It looks like the pairings are: Guiri/Chaos Mahaloth/Dizzy Gnarly/Giraffe Gnarly has been in an investigation with 4 out of 5 options. His only option left is Giraffe. Do we all just cross? |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
Night 3 is up.
|
|
|