As I stated, I disliked the votes placed on you by both Maha and Dizzy and I explained why I was voting for you. You haven't clarified your suspicions of Sario to my satisfaction, so my vote remains. Whether or not Scum is on board with this bandwagon isn't important to me: I haven't received enough information about other players to make me want to switch my vote, and right now you are the one being a distraction to Town, which is good enough for a Day 1 vote for me.
I asked Pizza if he was a Miller. I've been a Miller in another game, and I was lynched despite being Town. Had he said yes, it would be more information to work with.
"Scum came to zeener's aid but then just vote parked." I don't understand this. My vote is the last vote on you. What "scum" came to my aid?
Every wagon Day 1 is hardly a good wagon. In most cases, it's a mislynch. I have misgivings that your may well be a mislynch. But the way you're going about doesn't make me feel you can be trusted to help us find Scum.
1. Role fishing is role fishing.
2. Voting with suspicious votes is a scum trait regardless of how you try to justify it.
3. I find it highly unlikely you don't know what "V/LA" is but in the off-chance you don't...
V/LA is vacation/limited access. Somebody review Zeener's past games to see if he's encountered V/LA before. If he has he'll be caught red-handed.
4. "Until my satisfaction"=pre-emptively justifying vote parking. Especially glaring since the explaination has already been given and at this point highlighted even.
zeener's scum you guys. Since I don't know when the deadline is I'll just claim now that I'm Archimedes, the great scientist.
1. not if it is in response to another blatant statement
2.You have deemed them suspicious- I don't it.
3.I had no bloody clue what it meant either - not a familiar term
31st July 2015, 04:11 PM
Threaded Mode