#101
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#102
|
||||
|
||||
Without going into details, has anyone shared any powers?
|
#103
|
||||
|
||||
I’m guessing you tracked Kai?
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
and the other two? |
#105
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#106
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#107
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#108
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Bashorian Clement mainly because they voted straight away with zero discussion. Trying to look like they are contributing, but without actually participating. It's really just a FOS, and a reminder that I need to take a closer look at Bashorian Clement later. |
#109
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I did ask in an attempt to confirm/dispel Bear's theory - if anyone wanted to claim neighbourhood watch. no response. |
#110
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Everyone keeps saying there are three. I am not as convinced of that. Either way, if there are 3, then the 4th is a 3PP. Remember this game was supposed to have an additional player. I'm not sure which would be the best first choice to cut from a game--a scum or the 3PP? From a balance perspective, I'd say the 3PP should go. But from a--I'm the moderator and I took the time to set up this game and want to see all of the different fun things play out the way I intended--perspective, I'd want to keep the 3PP. So... yea, I think it's 3 scum and one 3PP. |
#111
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#112
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#113
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#114
|
||||
|
||||
I actually have to apologize…. Mini Dizzy had a spill on Friday and broke her foot. I’ve been in a whirlwind trying to put her 11 year old life back together since. I spent most of the day at school today figuring out just the next 5 days. Ugh!!
I have to reread a lot of this. I do not believe at this point either of my neighbors are scum. I think there’s a chance once is 3rd party but unless I’ve got wool over my eyes I don’t think I want to evict either one! I’ll attempt to check back in tonight. Ugh have to check when EOD actually is blah!
__________________
The Dizziest Lizzy |
#115
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#116
|
||||
|
||||
Scum have a hive mind. Any one of them could have connected the dots.
IF this is not true then Bear is fabricating a bunch! |
#117
|
||||
|
||||
I’m up on the hood talk LightFoot lol
__________________
The Dizziest Lizzy |
#118
|
||||
|
||||
I don't follow.
|
#119
|
||||
|
||||
I assume you are not prepared to confirm or deny?
|
#120
|
||||
|
||||
Bashorian Clement You have asked me a a few one line questions but not replied to my answers.
You seem to be operating behind the scenes. Any comments on our current state? |
#121
|
||||
|
||||
well, Bear's BRB seems to involve more time than I anticipated. zPost 113
|
#122
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#123
|
||||
|
||||
Yea, I got lost looking for answers. Only found more questions.
|
#124
|
||||
|
||||
She didn't but you made a post that leads that way. 2:46
|
#125
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My argument is that I followed this assumption with a pro-town strategy. So, if it is actually a scum slip, that means it is true, in which case, my proposed strategy would be pro-town. Why then, would I "slip up" and share something only scum knows, while using that information to propose a pro-town strategy? Your retort was that I must have been lying and leading town astray with my pro-town strategy that isn't really pro-town because it comes from false information and inaccurate "assumptions". So, my whole point to you is that if I was just leading town astray, then it wasn't a "scum slip". It can't be both a scum slip and a scum lie. It can't be both. It's not really fair for someone to say, "Oh, that is a scum slip". And then, after I successful argue against why it can't be a scum slip, someone says "Aha! Then it is a scum lie!". Maybe it's simply just a town assumption and a proposed strategy based on that assumption. If not, then its possibly a scum lie as you say. But it can't logically be a "scum slip" as others have claimed. |
#126
|
||||
|
||||
You are very good or very scum.
|
#127
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I did say that it could be a lie/proposed misconception for misdirection. AS any statement by any player could be. |
#128
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Garsh you are on a roll. Sorry for the snark. It is frustrating when my POV is not understood. |
#129
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Not voting: Dizzymrslizzy, Kaiveran, Plumpudding, raventhief, TexCat ![]() |
#130
|
||||
|
||||
World’s biggest sandwich. Must be 4 feet long!
|
#131
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Your response to that explanation was that it could be a lie. Well. If its a lie, then that precludes it from being a slip, in which case the primary "evidence" against me is bullshit. Thats my point. It cant be a lie and a slip. |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
arrrg.
|
#133
|
||||
|
||||
Illegal sandwich
Maybe someone wanted to make sure you didn't miss lunch? |
#134
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You have the answers according to you. Why the delay? |
#135
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If you are scum, you would already know who my neighbors are from chatting with your scum buddies. Nobody claimed that Dizzy was my neighbor, yet you went to that straight away after her post. As if you already knew that. Its possible you mistakenly thought dizzy claimed to he my neighbor in the main thread rather than you just knowing that from your private chats with guiri. That was my point. Either you made an immediate and brillainy deduction or you were scum and already knew it. |
#136
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I don't claim to have the answers. |
#137
|
|||||
|
|||||
:eyeroll:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
where did Dizzy tell you that they were neighbourhood watch????????????? |
#138
|
||||
|
||||
for the record I am not trying to focus on/pick on Bear - but his lack of understanding of what I am trying to re-explain makes me want to explain.
And he is here. Guiri are you following this? |
#139
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, but I can confirm Bear is in my neighborhood, and Dizzy claimed watcher, so that info comes from our neighborhood chat.
|
#140
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I can rest that case! |
#141
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Here's my explanation for this post. I am a watcher for my neighborhood. I have no animals that alert me. I don't have a bell or a whistle to blow, but I peer out of my awesome little home and see everything going on around my beloved piece of neighborhood. I saw last night someone *cough* visited Bear. I also saw last night someone visited Guiri. So why are you pushing so hard to out me Lightfoot? Why is that necessary? And do you want to explain your whereabouts last night???? |
#142
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
read 137 where I gleaned the info (how else would he know?) and the later you see guiri just confirmed. I was home last Night. |
#143
|
||||
|
||||
So now
who went a visiting Bear and guiri? |
#144
|
||||
|
||||
I know no one is going to tell me. It is a question for us to ponder nonetheless
|
#145
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#146
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#147
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#148
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Had I seen said crumbs it still doesn't make me Scum. Everyone looks for hints. |
#149
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You outted me Lightfoot. You and you alone, and I'm not that thrilled with it, and there's really only one way you would know that I was paired with Bear. |
#150
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thanks ever so for answering for Bear I wager guiri did not pronounce himself Scum in your 'hood though. |
|
|