#51
|
||||
|
||||
Who is in Raven's neighborhood? Is it possible that the bees detected intruders, that Raven was the neighborhood watch?
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
I have town reads on Dizzy, Lightfoot, Mahaloth, Mendie, Bashorian (in that order mostly). That leaves Kai and Plumpudding. I think Kai is the better execution today, but would switch to Plum. |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
I'm fine with my neighbors disclosing who is in our neighborhood.
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
All raven divulged was that their PR was seasonal .
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Kaiveran has attested that ey are town and not scum in this game, in our Shady Acres chat.
That said said, i cannot vouch for that. I am not against a Kai vote. |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
It appears the votes on Kaiveran are mostly POE
Does anyone have additional/ supporting information as well? |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
From my POV As close to confirmed Town as possible: LightFoot Bashorian Me Probably Town Mendie Mahaloth Left: (I investigated one of these last night) Kai TexCat Plum
__________________
The Dizziest Lizzy |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
My list matches yours - although I am not sure where to put BC.
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
why why take Mendie's claim at face value? Especially when don't believe that Plumpudding and TexCat are the team? |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Ok, but, why would Anon go for the breadcrumb / "No I in Anonymous" today, if we weren't supposed to .... extract from it?
|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The entire point of this post is that I'm not taking Mendie's claim at face value. Which should be incredibly obvious to anyone who actually reads the whole post (you know, clicking that blue arrow block thingy?). If anyone is legitimately confused, the tl;dr for that post is that I'm quite skeptical that the game has been solved with the ease that it appears to have been solved, and thus I feel like we should investigate at least some ways we can be wrong, lest we follow a beautiful but wrong POE off a cliff. Let's not get too uncareful with our stabbin' sticks, if I may revisit a ![]() Mendie of course could be lying, and even if she's telling the truth, that doesn't make her town. Although reviewing neighborhood happenings, I'm pretty sure she would've busted a cap in my ass already, had she actual access to any cap-busting capabilities. So, 3P at worst. Oh, and in case you were wondering, I do think you're pretty damn scummy, but I also think if your team is doc-hunting fresh off guiri getting axed, I don't think Dizzy is a very sensible action target. Therefore why I'm not voting for you right now. So out of the remaining candidates (Maha, Plum, TexCat), sure, Maha has a fresh town-indicative result on him, but more importantly, both him and TexCat are pretty much being their usual terse, low volume selves. Plum, by contrast, is absolutely phoning it in here compared to his last game as town, I feel. So despite my doubts, that's where I feel most comfortable voting rn. Still, I have no truly convincing indications that Plum and TexCat are the team at present, mostly because it's kinda hard to read into those two in the first place. To my knowledge neither of them have much interactions with each other or even the other players. I don't even think guiri interacted substantively with them either. In fact, I seem to recall the majority of the people he really talked to have either flipped town or are strongly indicated to be town by now (like Dizzy). Which is sort of the fucked-up point of a disconnected wolfing strategy. Lay back, don't get on each other's case either way unless it blends into what town is doing, and watch town eat themselves. And oftentimes, it works! – because it exploits our primal fear of pushing into the unknown. It denies you the information you need to make an actual informed decision (instead of just an educated guess), and exploits the inherent bias towards axing someone who's there and active and generating lots of information that develops as the game progresses – because there's simply more narratives of them being scum you can fit all that data into. And sure, that's the strategy I suspect the wolves are using, to a great degree. But I'm reluctant to go "all in" on that theory when there could still yet be a "defending" or "bussing" facet of the strategy I haven't picked up on yet. You feel me? |
#62
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Vanta's wording in the OP seems open to the possibility it may not have been. |
#63
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
See also D3, where I went back over both guiri and dizzy to see who was the wolf. Sure, one of them was much shorter and less explicit than the other due to time pressure, but both of them went into reasons for and against their scumminess (Prosecution/Defense). You'll also notice that claims/results are largely absent from the figuring there. I basically tried to solve as if the results/claims were meaningless, and focused entirely on the how instead of the what of their histories. In the end I decided that Dizzy's moves just made a bit more sense as town than guiri's. In a game like this I think it's always pertinent to remember that we don't truly have all the answers and know all the mechanics until the game is over. With that in mind, I think we should all sip the occasional draught of STORMB. |
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Mrowrf, I'm sure there's something important I forgot to address here, but I just had the worst Thursday in my ~3 year history at this workplace so I'm p.much outta gas at this point. Broke business records PLUS a bunch of shit broke and ran out so I had to stay 2 hours late cleaning and prepping.
Unless things remain such a clusterfuck that I get an emergency call-in tomorrow, I should have some time to fire up my digger again. |
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It was easier to understand "guiri is scum" and take a risk that it was accurate. |
#66
|
||||
|
||||
OOG
I'm kinda just left with a "hands off" approach to it all. That, things happen for reason, and more to the point, they have to happen, in that way, FOR that reason. Other than all of that, Yeah, lets attempt to play some Mafia. |
#67
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And I'm reminded that you think it's "totally possible" that Mod flubbed the setup, which is something that happens once every, what, 100 plus games? It's an insinuation that is made by the desperate. |
#68
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe it's something with me, but I can't make head or tails of how you got to where you did.
|
#69
|
||||
|
||||
I'll just add that I remain intrigued that this game was ever winnable for town, given how weak our powers are.
If that crosses into flubbed set up, I can't say. |
#70
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
With 8 alive, it takes 5 votes to evict. Last edited by Vanta Black; 2nd June 2023 at 11:59 AM. |
#71
|
||||
|
||||
Just to be clear, if Dizzy changes her vote I will follow.
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Fixed. Thanks for noting this. |
#74
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#75
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I am the reporter (anon-poster) that receives Dizzy’s results. And on N3 I received word that plumpudding is scum. My trail of breadcrumbs:
If there’s any doubt, I can also send a private anonymous message in lieu of a public one, so I can truly cross confirm with Dizzy. So yes, let’s get the plum-wagon-train a-rollin’. But please, please, pleeeez, let’s also have some productive discourse on the side. As for why a single letter was deleted from my message: I have no effing idea. I didn’t do that; some other force did. |
#76
|
||||
|
||||
I can confirm that I asked for an investigation on Plum yesterday.
[unvote] Kai [\unvote]
__________________
The Dizziest Lizzy |
#77
|
||||
|
||||
So this leaves us with some interesting stuff going on.
Questions: @Kaiveran ;- I was going with Bears probable that there’s a scum in each hood theory. Mendie’s claim seems too genuine to be faked Imo. Guiri was all for protecting the quiet which is why I hit there last night. @TexCat ; Not looking the best for you right now bud. A little info on what’s going on with you would be nice! @Bashorian Clement ;was your powers one shot?
__________________
The Dizziest Lizzy |
#78
|
||||
|
||||
Birnam Woods Still has 3 living neighbours.
Lucky neighbourhood. |
#79
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
I have BC as a light blue name, but I can't recall why.
Can someone point me to the Day he was semi approved? |
#81
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Today, first couple of posts of the Day. BC visited me and we shook hands. If you trust me, then please trust my opinion on this for today. I’m 95% positive I can clear him.
__________________
The Dizziest Lizzy |
#82
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
No? I have local sourced honey to offer... Still no? Fine. Grumblebuzz grumblebuzz |
#83
|
||||
|
||||
Good. Easy.
|
#84
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#85
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
"" First of all the community message board lights up, but there seems to be a slight problem. Did someone forget to pay the maintenance people? "" |
#86
|
||||
|
||||
Fireworks, anyone?
![]() Quote:
With 8 alive, it takes 5 votes to evict. OOG the fireworks have started in Denver already, owing to some basketball team winning a game I think. My cats hate it. My dog doesn't appear to care. Possibly she is a Nuggets fan. |
#88
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
One shot? how many ya got? |
#89
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I can't trust anyone. Although I lean Town at some. |
#90
|
||||
|
||||
NETA "BC visited me and we shook hands."Nope that is not it. And what matters he admits to the visit. Has naught to do with what he was there for.
|
#91
|
||||
|
||||
BC, someone semi cleared you. I wager you remember who/where.
|
#92
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think there's a max of 3 scum & 1 3P though, so one may still be technically scum-free. And if I'm a hostile party of any sort, I think it's pretty obvious why I wouldn't be assisting you in mercilessly stomping the scum to death, as I am. Also, if my neighborhood (Shady Acres) is indeed all town, my money's on one of the other hoods (Circle Drive/Birnam Woods) being S-3-T, if ya get me. I thought about that being a viable combination way back at Day 1. With all that in mind, I think it might be a good idea for @LightFoot to reveal neighborhoods, as she originally planned. (2) My previous argument wassn't necessarily that Mendie's claim is fake. She absolutely could be claiming her true result, while not being town-aligned. The thing is she hasn't played overtly pro-scum or retaliated at me, and also Lie Detector is not really something you give to a wolf in general. Hence my shift to her being either town or 3P. Basically the two plausible Shady Acres worlds from my perspective: 1) Every hood has one non-town, hence Mendie 3P. 2) One hood has Town/3P/Scum OR there are only two scum, hence Mendie town. Also, @Dizzymrslizzy you have trailing spaces within your mention tags, which appears to be why they're not working. @TexCatconsider this a half-phase head-start on convincing us why you're not scum with guiri/plum. |
#93
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
purple "fruit(ful)" = the plum in plumpudding (also the post was replying to DIzzy specifically, hinting that) and yes the color is supposed to be hard to detect, especially on the light background on the forums, because it publicly encodes information that I didn't actually want found until I pointed it out later. that's what a breadcrumb is. |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
But what about the pink stuff? Are you saying here that you've never detected any activity on me? I'd believe that given that I was scapegoat-y for the first two cycles and my powers being passive/undirected, but now that my N3 message has been tampered with, that doesn't seem right at all. If so, I think we might have a Ninja/Stealth something in the mix. |
#96
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If I wasn't clear |
#97
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Are we being told that except for the N1 cacophony Shady Acres has gone unmolested? Or is almost drunk me no remembering? |
#98
|
||||
|
||||
Hell if I only played sober you would eliminate me for low participation.
I freely admit there are a few points that I made notations about and forgot why. |
#99
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quote:
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
Now if plum flips Town*all bets are off on my top suspects
![]() *I doubt it, but they have been AWOL everywhere and may have been pegged as an easy mizzle who would not return to present a defense. |
|
|