
29th October 2010, 05:40 AM
|
 |
formerly Normal Phase
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,386
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locked In The Trunk Of A Car
There are plenty of detectives in the Batman universe. Batman himself is really much more of a vigilante. In which case, Bear's hypothesis makes more sense.
|
Well, technically, he is a vigilante detective* (based on the comics, as I haven't seen The Dark Knight, although I did see Batman Begins). For a time, it was common for comics Robin to hear "We can tell you were trained by the world's greatest detective."
I figured out what's been bothering me about Bear's weird interpretation of his PM. It reminds me of Pleonast in Dr. Horrible. Both of them jumped to bizarre conclusions not stated in their PMs based on their own assumptions.
In Bear's case, if this is a fake claim, he could just as easily claimed that the PM actually did say Batman had to target him instead of admitting that it was his own idea. It would make much more sense to say it's actually in there if he's lying.
*I joke-claimed Batman, Vigilante Detective in one game. No one believed me. Probably because it was not a Batman themed game. 
|
What was Pleonast's alignment in that game? (Not sure it matters ultimately, but it seems the obvious question.)
|