#501
|
||||
|
||||
Okay, fine; you're a VIXEN because it is easier to spell.
|
#502
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Well, that's ...horrifying. |
#504
|
||||
|
||||
STG has a "fashy haircut". Look at a pic of Richard Spencer for reference.
If I were her and I read the criticisms in this thread and the dope snark 7 thread created 6 years ago, I would kill myself. lol That being said. There's a reason why I'm still single. Women like her are ABUNDANT in lesbian land. I can't stand it... |
#505
|
||||
|
||||
mr. jp illegally downloaded a movie at someone else's apartment in Germany and it got traced to his host's IP, resulting in a €500 fine, which his host has to pay. mr jp thinks he shouldn't be liable, even though piracy is illegal in Germany.
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=839993 |
#506
|
||||
|
||||
That's the thing. Yes, art takes some innate talent to be truly good at it, but technical proficiency can be learned and honed. For as long as she's been hacking away at terrible art, she should be able to make something that, while not good, is at least not terrible. But she can't even do that. The stuff she makes today looks almost identical to the stuff she was making 6+ years ago. Look at some of the web comics from guys who admit they're not artistically inclined and compare their early strips to their later strips. There are quite a few who became decent enough within their own limitations. You can see improvement over time of their art. Not so with STG. She started out at a level of apathetic mediocrity and fought to stay there.
|
#507
|
||||
|
||||
Sounds like me with guitar. After ten years when guys who'd played six months were better than me, I realized I would never get good at it no matter how much I practiced.
|
#508
|
||||
|
||||
Wow, the sock hunters are on point today. I saw a question in Cafe Society I actually knew the answer to and so wanted to help the OP out. I socked up, answered the question, and was promptly banned and had my almost-definitely-the-correct-answer answer deleted so the poor OP will never know the song he's looking for. I know, I know, "socks are banned there, you know the rules" and all that, but when it was a legit answer to a question, you have to wonder what had them looking so intently.
Also, if Idle or someone else wants to help minlokwat out, I'm almost positive, based on his description, that the song he's asking about is Bahamadia's "Uknowhowwedu" |
#509
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
ST, however, said "Fuck it, I'm too lazy to practice drawing faces so I'll just mock them up in Poser and trace over them. And it's my style and I'm not changing it and anyway I'm too lazy to do it over." Last edited by Someone; 27th October 2017 at 06:57 AM. Reason: added quote |
#510
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of all that, I took a clue from the quiet hopeless sobbing of my art teacher. You're welcome.
|
#511
|
||||
|
||||
Malcolm Gladwell is mocked for his 100,000 hour rule but there's a lot of truth to it -- never understood the derision (it's not like he insists all people become good at the 100,001th hour)
|
#512
|
||||
|
||||
10,000 hours.
|
#513
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...80&postcount=3 http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...84&postcount=4 |
#514
|
||||
|
||||
Heh, thanks, socks-by-proxy!
|
#515
|
||||
|
||||
|
#516
|
||||
|
||||
|
#517
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#518
|
||||
|
||||
That 10K hours or whatever was bad pop science that had its base in real science. Link to the paper from 1993 (pdf).
|
#519
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Usually I roll my eyes at the Doper obsession with "doing the right thing," but in this case the pile-on is entirely justified. |
#520
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() |
#521
|
||||
|
||||
We can submit ban recommendations? Awesome!
![]() |
#522
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#523
|
||||
|
||||
guys remember the citizenpained/farmer jane debacle
|
#525
|
||||
|
||||
some relevant reading:
the cheating ex/std/ectopic pregnancy saga the anxiety is killing me which was running concurrent to the first link pit thread snark thread here where it was discussed as it was happening the first link is the real drama bomb and is what leads to the pit thread. this is one of those situations where i think the snark got slightly out of hand. i mean i participated so no judgment or anything. if the topic gets going i'll elaborate but i'm going to bed so you will have to wait for my pearls of wisdom ![]() |
#526
|
||||
|
||||
|
#527
|
||||
|
||||
|
#528
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() |
#529
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#530
|
||||
|
||||
|
#531
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#533
|
||||
|
||||
She's an expert in violating the laws of science with her
Anyway, new troll! |
#534
|
||||
|
||||
that's boring Argie
|
#535
|
||||
|
||||
You're so demanding.
|
#536
|
||||
|
||||
In which AHunter blushes, lowers his eyes, and shyly reveals that he has fallen head over heels with his own reflection:
Quote:
|
#537
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#538
|
||||
|
||||
holy shit that AHunter screed is wayyyyy tldr. a summary?
|
#539
|
||||
|
||||
He's a guy who mostly likes what he sees as girl stuff rather than guy stuff. This is apparently a subject of endless fascination to him, and he thinks everybody should share that fascination.
|
#540
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#541
|
||||
|
||||
aldiboronti starts a thread: We're all about fighting ignorance here! That includes religion, too! You guys agree with me, don't you?
The Dope's atheist brigade, weary of being oppressed and silenced, storms out of the woodwork as if this is the very first time they've discussed this. Needless to say, Czarcasm is ON IT. |
#542
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Code:
Pages: 4 Words: 2960 Characters: 16358 |
#543
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
#544
|
||||
|
||||
Between posting the word-count and reading your post, I tried to read it. Honest. I went back a couple of times and started over. I tried skimming. I tried just reading one paragraph toward the end. Nothing worked. I think the only reasonable summary is "I [AH] have nothing to say, but by God, I'm gonna take all day to say it".
|
#545
|
||||
|
||||
One of AHunter's problems is that he isn't posting on the dope in 2003 anymore, which was a time where any sort gender identity issues had to be met with full, unwavering, unquestioning support, or the voices of dissent would be run off by an angry mob wielding torches and pitchforks. Now, the liberal tone of the dope was something I always liked about the place, but in the earlier days of the board it was often to the level of "so open minded, our brains fell out". That's why the Kaitlyn thing fooled so many people, and even when the discrepancies in her posts were pointed out you had people desperately grasping at straws trying to handwave them away until Kaitlyn confessed. Some of that still lingers on the board today, but it seems like, generally speaking, people are a little more willing to push back and call people on it when something seems like BS, which is what is happening in his most recent thread.
He admits his blog doesn't have any kind of following, and since the dope doesn't like people to just drop links to blog posts to get traffic, he got permission to just post the blogs in full. He posted a link to a YouTube video of himself speaking at some sort of event from last year that had 0 comments and like 100 views or something. So clearly he doesn't have much of an audience aside from the dope, so I'm guessing that's where the recent thread bemoaning the fact that people think he's full of it is coming from - his only audience is turning on him. The way I see it is he knows he doesn't quite fit into the LGBT community and he's trying his hardest to insert himself where he doesn't really belong. He's trying to coin the term "male girl", which is not a thing, and it's not going to become a thing no matter how many 5,000 word essays he posts on the internet. (Stop trying to make fetch happen. It's not going to happen!) He's been trying to emerge from a closet that he never belonged in for god only knows how long now. Dude, you're an effeminate, straight male. We know. Everyone who has ever known you knows. There's nothing deeper here. There's nothing unique. I've known dozens like you. So has everyone here. I..did not realize I was going to go on for that long. I guess it's been building. So there you have it. ![]() |
#546
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#547
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#548
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#549
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You write well. AH does not. Which one is "Girly"? I dunno, but which one writes better is no contest... ETA: Awright, I read it, again. I was a bit too hasty. Yours was a bit... uhh... AHunterish, too. It was actually readable, though, so you weren't dong too badly. Last edited by Someone; 28th October 2017 at 06:04 PM. |
#550
|
||||
|
||||
Chessic Sense claims he poops in his shower.
expectopatronum, I think you nailed it perfectly. I do see one problem being that we really don't have a good word for a male version of a tomboy. But that's basically what he is. He prefers classical music and museums to sports? So does my dad! My mother, my sister and me are the sports fans in the family -- my dad couldn't give less of a shit. Doesn't make any of us genderqueer. Meanwhile, I pretty much loathe chickflicks and most girly shows with a passion and I adore hockey. Big whoop. That doesn't even go into tomboy territory. Most people are a complicated bunch. It's like, we get it, you're different, and that's cool. I can buy he's rather eccentric. But he's really, really bad at communicating his ideas, and refuses to accept that. He gets frustrated with us because we just can't understand how he's somehow different from your average feminine guy. But if he can't convince us, no matter how many blog entries he posts, the problem isn't on our end. The only real "genderqueer" thing I'm seeing is tendency towards bad fashion sense. Maybe it's just me, but I've noticed that a lot of genderqueer individuals seem to have really bad taste in fashion. Seriously, if you're going to cross dress, don't go about it all half-assed. His style sounds like "People of Walmart". Whatever your gender identity, that's not good ; (Sorry, I'm a fashion snob) |
![]() |
|
|