Go Back   The Giraffe Boards > Main > The Game Room > Mafia Central > The Dungeon
Register Blogs GB FAQ Forum Rules Community Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 20th March 2015, 04:25 AM
Dizzymrslizzy's Avatar
Dizzymrslizzy Dizzymrslizzy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,378
Goodbye Colby



Why would you allow me to waste my investigation last night? Really Anti-Town.
  #52  
Old 20th March 2015, 04:27 AM
Dizzymrslizzy's Avatar
Dizzymrslizzy Dizzymrslizzy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,378
Please, Please Explain how you think you were being Towny and allowed that to happen. I'm honestly kind of off at the moment. It's SO scummy at this point it's not even funny
  #53  
Old 20th March 2015, 04:28 AM
bufftabby's Avatar
bufftabby bufftabby is offline
pious bird of good omen
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: in a pinch
Posts: 12,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by SisterCoyote View Post
Bufftabby came back town.

I think I should investigate you toNight then, see if the feeling's mutual.
  #54  
Old 20th March 2015, 04:53 AM
Mahaloth's Avatar
Mahaloth Mahaloth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,844
It does seem like Colby does not know his name.

Vote colby
  #55  
Old 20th March 2015, 05:21 AM
Scáthach's Avatar
Scáthach Scáthach is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by bufftabby View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiri View Post
Colby, what's the Kung fu fighting reference then? If Bruce is a reference to the Ark?

Yeah, if you're like me, you got "Lee" out of all that. If the clue were "Evan", I could buy "Ark" as the intent.

Colby admits to completely screwing up investigations both Nights. He gave a clue that could really mean anything at all. I really don't think Colby knows his name at all.
yeah I'm cool with this
  #56  
Old 20th March 2015, 05:24 AM
guiri's Avatar
guiri guiri is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by SisterCoyote View Post
Bufftabby came back town.
Something is also up in Noah's world...

With claims of "Ark" from Swammi (confirmed by death), McGinty, Lightfoot, SisterCoyote and Bufftabby, we have an issue...

1. Bufftabby got no result on Lightfoot N1, and vice-versa. Both investigations cannot have been tampered with so it's safe to say that they do not share surnames.
2. McGinty investigated Lightfoot N2 and got no result. Since McGinty got a result on Swammi N1, Lightfoot must not share surnames with McGinty and Swammi OR the scum spent their sole investigation blocking this one
3. Lightfoot investigated SisterC last night and got no result, again presumably different last name OR the scum spent their sole investigation blocking this one

Any way, the Ark group is interesting as Lightfoot appears to have no potential pair from the current claimants: someone is lying about a result, they attracted the only scum investigation - which is curious itself, or there's another hidden Ark...
  #57  
Old 20th March 2015, 05:25 AM
guiri's Avatar
guiri guiri is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,685
Scathach, no comments on my issues with your lack of a result on Texcat?
  #58  
Old 20th March 2015, 05:35 AM
Scáthach's Avatar
Scáthach Scáthach is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiri View Post
Scathach, no comments on my issues with your lack of a result on Texcat?
I'm wavering. I think you make a good point but I was hoping to hear from some of the others too.

If texcat IS scum then it was quite a good ploy, jump in as soon as someone has revealed a name, then fake claim a town investigation on someone. Bill being killed N0 would tie in to that neatly since the last thing a scum Texcat wants is lots of people running around with the same name as her.
  #59  
Old 20th March 2015, 07:35 AM
SisterCoyote's Avatar
SisterCoyote SisterCoyote is offline
Shroedinger's Coyote
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Riverside County
Posts: 7,434
Blog Entries: 4
Send a message via AIM to SisterCoyote
Since we've pretty much got Colby dead to rights, I'm wondering who else we should look at. Guiri raises a good point about Lightfoot, and also the Texcat situation.

Hm. For now:

but I'll probably come back and change that later.
  #60  
Old 20th March 2015, 07:37 AM
TexCat's Avatar
TexCat TexCat is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,057
I think that's a hammer.
  #61  
Old 20th March 2015, 07:38 AM
guiri's Avatar
guiri guiri is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by SisterCoyote View Post
Since we've pretty much got Colby dead to rights, I'm wondering who else we should look at. Guiri raises a good point about Lightfoot, and also the Texcat situation.

Hm. For now:

but I'll probably come back and change that later.
What do you think about the points I make about the Arks?
  #62  
Old 20th March 2015, 08:29 AM
SisterCoyote's Avatar
SisterCoyote SisterCoyote is offline
Shroedinger's Coyote
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Riverside County
Posts: 7,434
Blog Entries: 4
Send a message via AIM to SisterCoyote
I think you may be on to something, but I need to go back and see if we've got everyone's name. I'm not sure if we do; I thought there were a couple of holdouts besides me yesterDay.
  #63  
Old 20th March 2015, 08:51 AM
guiri's Avatar
guiri guiri is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,685
Well, Colby, who presumably we´ll see in a short time, and the only other one is Visorslash, who I suspect is also scum. Hey there @Visorslash, catching up slowly?
  #64  
Old 20th March 2015, 08:54 AM
Giraffe's Avatar
Giraffe Giraffe is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 15,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by guiri View Post
Any way, the Ark group is interesting as Lightfoot appears to have no potential pair from the current claimants: someone is lying about a result, they attracted the only scum investigation - which is curious itself, or there's another hidden Ark...
There's certainly been a lot of activity in the Ark group:

Claimed Arks: Heterometrus swammerdammi, Mrs. McGinty, Sister Coyote, bufftabby, Lightfoot

Mrs. McGinty investigated Heterometrus N1, got a Town result
Swammi investigated Mrs. McGinty N2, but got NK'd before he could share his result
Sister Coyote investigated bufftabby N2, got a Town result
Lightfoot has been investigated by both bufftabby and Mrs. McGinty with no result

The two most suspicious characters in this play are Mrs. McGinty and Sister Coyote. If Mrs. McGinty is scum, she could have lied about her investigations of both Swammi and Lightfoot -- the scum would have had no choice but to NK Swammi to cover her tracks once the idea of reciprocal investigations was proposed. Similarly, a scum Sister could have fake-claimed an investigation result on bufftabby to try to snuggle up to her and make up for her late name claim. Obviously, bufftabby should investigate Sister toNight. Scum may have hoped to keep Sister alive with a bufftabby NK, so if that happens I'd argue we lynch Sister toMorrow regardless.
  #65  
Old 20th March 2015, 10:30 AM
Mrs McGinty's Avatar
Mrs McGinty Mrs McGinty is offline
Hardclam: Bivalve
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Contained
Posts: 1,045


Unanimous bandwagons make me leery. Also, no sense rushing this.
  #66  
Old 20th March 2015, 10:32 AM
guiri's Avatar
guiri guiri is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,685
Isn't Day over thanks to SisC?
  #67  
Old 20th March 2015, 10:38 AM
Red Skeezix's Avatar
Red Skeezix Red Skeezix is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 1,240
The day has been hammered. However I am at work and can't close the day for a few more hours. Colby please consider yourself dead. I will post a reveal once I get home tonight.
  #68  
Old 20th March 2015, 10:57 AM
Mrs McGinty's Avatar
Mrs McGinty Mrs McGinty is offline
Hardclam: Bivalve
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Contained
Posts: 1,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
the scum would have had no choice but to NK Swammi to cover her tracks once the idea of reciprocal investigations was proposed.
I'd point out that reciprocal investigations were an obvious - and perhaps the only sensible - move, and that any half-competent scum would have seen it coming.

On the other hand, with Swammi looking quite clearly townie, and also being highly active in organising everyone else, it might still have seemed a good idea to claim a successful scan before bumping him off. Of course, I know that that's not the case, and that the scum will have seen me as potential lynch-bait today, what with me being a relative unknown around here and having given what was a completely unexplained and apparently nonsensical breadcrumb.

I saw all of this coming, which is why I posted my explanation as soon as possible this morning. Indeed, the only reason I waited that long was in case I was mistaken and the scum chose to kill someone else for some reason I'd failed to anticipate.

Should 'the most convoluted breadcrumb ever' push me down the suspect list or up? That's for y'all to decide. I'll argue my innocence to the last, but I've been around the block enough times not to throw a hissy fit at anyone who votes against me on this basis. All I'd ask is that people read my posts as they're written, and don't allow confirmation bias to make them think I'm 'flinching', 'squirming', 'flailing', or 'panicking'. Even if I was scum, I wouldn't be doing that (most likely, I'd hardly have been posting at all - where is Visorslash, btw?)
  #69  
Old 20th March 2015, 11:03 AM
guiri's Avatar
guiri guiri is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,685
Visor's been following along, hasn't posted since N1 but was recently reading D3 thread, unless his account's been hacked... That's why I mentioned him earlier...
  #70  
Old 20th March 2015, 11:04 AM
Mrs McGinty's Avatar
Mrs McGinty Mrs McGinty is offline
Hardclam: Bivalve
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Contained
Posts: 1,045
Probably scum, then.
  #71  
Old 20th March 2015, 11:16 AM
TexCat's Avatar
TexCat TexCat is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,057
  Night 1Night 2
 playerlooked atlooked at
Rip1. Mahalothmrs MGiraffe
Rip3. ChaosgiraffeDizzy
Rip8. guiridizzyGnarly
Rip11. DizzymrslizzygnarlyColby
Rip12. GiraffeguiriChaos
Rip13. gnarlycharliechaosMahaloth
Rip15. Colby11giraffeGuiri
Ark5. bufftabbyLight Footswammi
Ark6. Sister Coyote Bufftabby
Ark9. lightfootBuffSisC
Ark Steamer10. Heterometrus swammerdamizuma 
Ark16. Mrs. McGintyswammiLightfoot
Ito Cowpen4. Zumamahaloth 
Ito7. texcatscathachvisorslash
Ito Freehold14. BillMc  
Ito17. Scathachbilltexcat
?2. Visorslash  

I've updated Lightfoot's table.
I think we should continue the reverse investigations of the town results:
Scathach should investigate me again.
Bufftabby should investigate SisC.
But I don't know what the rest of us should do.
  #72  
Old 20th March 2015, 11:20 AM
TexCat's Avatar
TexCat TexCat is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,057
Is it possible to investigate dead players? Could I investigate BillMc tonight? And get a town result if we have the same name?
  #73  
Old 20th March 2015, 12:02 PM
SisterCoyote's Avatar
SisterCoyote SisterCoyote is offline
Shroedinger's Coyote
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Riverside County
Posts: 7,434
Blog Entries: 4
Send a message via AIM to SisterCoyote
Um. Oops.

Sorry I dropped the hammer.
  #74  
Old 20th March 2015, 12:41 PM
Dizzymrslizzy's Avatar
Dizzymrslizzy Dizzymrslizzy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,378
We're getting down to the End of the RIP investigations. Maybe tonight is our night!



So I propose for tonight one of two things:

It looks like the pairings are:
Guiri/Chaos
Mahaloth/Dizzy
Gnarly/Giraffe

Gnarly has been in an investigation with 4 out of 5 options. His only option left is Giraffe.

Do we all just cross?
  #75  
Old 20th March 2015, 03:32 PM
Red Skeezix's Avatar
Red Skeezix Red Skeezix is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 1,240
Night 3 is up.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.7 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Management has discontinued messages until further notice.