#1
|
||||
|
||||
A long expected snarking. Durpbo Adams' eleventy first thread
There will never be monthly threads. NEVER! We have spoken.
Also, FPB, Also--fun new rule that I just now made up and may never enforce (or use again). The first 57 (including this one) posts may bitch about the title. The 58th onward it's verboten and you'll be boxed for an arbitry period. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Dribbling's of a drunken derper. Durpo Adams my assityass.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Third! Second bitcher.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Fourth forth with force.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Yay with the thread title, which I think I might have suggested (the eleventy-first part, anyway):
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
The old shaggy sheep dog will box you.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
This is post number 10. You have 47 more "Bitch about the thread title" posts available.
BE AWARE! |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I loved that book.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Okay. On such short notice, I offer Shodan responding in a pit thread on UnbannedRedneck.
There are two kinds of heterosexual men - those that look at women's boobs, and those that lie about looking at women's boobs. Feminist men tend to fall into the second category. Regards, Shodan https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb...9&postcount=11 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
this title is stupid
no monthly threads or i shall be very cross ![]() |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Stupid title. I knew eleventyfirst would be used, just didn't realize how badly it would be done.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
What say we delve into the classics?
Wildest Bill, go fuck yourself In post #6, Esprix offers up half a dozen examples of Bill's, shall we say, quirky views on life. And in post #25 Fenris wants to know if we know what he's saying, but I don't think even he knows. Somewhere in the archives there's also a thread where Bill snivels about getting a speeding ticket, and then it comes out that he was street racing and he gets dragged over the coals by the offenderati. But damn if I can find it. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
What do you have against monthly threads?
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
It's a Fenris title. Of course it's stupid.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
they're dumb and they go on too long
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
We're still talking about the titles, right?
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
"Mexican fat burners". I think that's what they were called.
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Just found it:
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...5&pagenumber=1 and the follow-up Pit thread https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb...ad.php?t=61561 The phrase to search for is "Mexican fat burners" |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, yeah -- I forgot that he implied I slept with my professor in order to get rides to my next class. Charming individual.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Even by Fenris' standards, this title is bad.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
What does it mean?
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
The Hobbit begins with a reference to Bilbo Baggins "Eleventy-first" (111st) birthday. The alternate title to the book is "An Unexpected Journey." Put those through a Fenris and you get this crap.
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
And Adams?
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Cecil I guess. Remember, it's Fenris.
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
This is post #30. You have 27 more posts to bitch about the title.
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Also, READ MY RETROSNARK AND ACKNOWLEDGE IT!!!!
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
And yet...
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
...they DO count. Nyahh-nyaah
![]() |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Also, 57 has great numerological significance. It's hardly arbitrary
![]() |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
I read your retro-snark. It was nice.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
When I read those old snark threads and realize how little has changed in SEVENTEEN GODDAMNED YEARS I just get too sad to snark.
Can we start a new thread to just complain about the shitty snark titles? I'm not sure 57 posts is enough. |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
I'm anxiously awaiting post 56 so I can get the magic post for my title complaint. Pad the post-count some more...
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
YOU may have one (1) free post wherein you can "whine about the thread title" after post 57 because you liked my retrosnark and followed instructions.
![]() Everyone else? This won't work again. Beck is the only winner of the Non-Transferrable 58 and beyond thread title snark coupon. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Also, with this post, (#40), you only have 17 more where you're allowed to bitch about the title without CONSEQUENCES.
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
![]() |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
That’s a title alright.
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
I'll just park this here then keep editing to add comments about the title.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
I never get the titles.
This is not a complaint so it doesn't count towards the 57 posts. |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
The numerology number 57 resonates with creative expression.
It tends to assert its sense of personal freedom into its creativity. The result can be unexpectedly creative communication and artistic works. 57 tends to be both an extrovert and an introvert, both talkative and introspective, both consulting with others and looking inward for answers. |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
The title...
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
is really...
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
fucking...
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
stupid
|
![]() |
|
|