Greek History Mafia N1

[guiri]

Originally Posted by Sooh

Zeener did say he wasn't satisfied with lulz's explanation in post 203. I don't know if this is intentionally misrepping or if you really didn't notice/remember.

Lemme see, we can argue over words, but the actions speak for themselves. You try to summarise all this in a single sentence when the deadline is about to arrive and we're likely to no-lynch:

41 I voted Lulz for the naked vote and no further commentary.
56 Sario commented that it was highly suspicious.
79 I replied that highly suspicious play, on D1, deserves a vote and wondered why Sario hadn't.
105 Lulz naked voted Sario.
120 Lulz posts some gifs to say Sario is scum.
121 Lulz claims Sario's frustration is fake
123 Sario asks why Lulz voted her
124 Lulz refers to my point about Sario finding something highly suspicious but not voting
125 Sooh cross-posts, wants an explanation for Lulz' vote on Sario
126 Sooh sees Lulz' post, has got answer
>>>>>141 Zeener quotes Sooh's 125, ignoring Lulz' 124 and Sooh's 126, as if Lulz has yet to explain his vote, and votes lulz using the lack of explanation as the reason<<<<<
180 Lulz votes Zeener stating that he'd already explained his vote
181 Sooh seems to have forgotten her 126 and says she can't find where Lulz explained his vote
182 Lulz quotes the relevant bit
183 Sooh clarifies
184 Lulz confirms
203 Zeener seems to ignore his previous claim that Lulz never explained his vote and now claims that he hasn't explained it "to his satisfaction", thus undermining his original reason for voting while keeping his vote for an entirely new, however related, reason - quite unreasonable too, especially for a D1 vote which was later remove