Quote:
Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by idrinkthere4iam
Not drinking. Well I was. But that's not my excuse. New work schedule. Lack of sleep. That pretty much sums up my absence. Reading now. May post if something strikes me. Otherwise going to bed. New schedule messed up sleep cycle. So trying to get it on track.
|
Bolded.
Bolded.
You don't find lulz or Double A scummy.
That's it. Double A and Lulz look ordinary to Drink day 1.
Zeener looked like scum and was not.
That is the entirety of Drink's reads.
====================DAY TWO
So, for behavior that he did not find scummy on Day One, and with LITERALLY nothing happening since then except his being wrong about Zeener, Double A is now scum.
How's that process working for you?
Wow, this is so villagery. 
Clearly.
I see all the analysis, the logical progression of your vote, and your concrete reasons!
Quote:
Originally Posted by idrinkthere4iam
I was referencing that you did it. And everyone jumped on you. Then when I provide rationale for my vote I get voted for because being providing reason being why I voted for who I did.
|
This is your contribution to the game, Drink.
Bottom line: Set on fire, put in the river of death. |
I suspected Double A after he voted Zeener right after me. After Zeener was shown to be Town I started looking back and the quickness that Double A voted Zeener stood out to me. So yeah, after during Day 1 I didn't suspect Double A but I did afterwards. And I thought I explained that in my posts yesterDay, but maybe I didn't do it well enough.
And I never suspected lulz, who you defend. In fact, I defended him wen others were voting for him based on his previous gameplay here. I didn't think he appeared Scummy at all and thought that was a bad vote as well.
11th August 2015, 02:32 PM
Hybrid Mode
