|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
All I have to do is outwait you retards, and I win. Didn't factor that into your little game, did you?
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
I may have considered that possibility and planned accordingly.
|
#105
|
||||
|
||||
Not if we pay Fenris to ban you.
|
#106
|
||||
|
||||
Despite his many, many, many foibles, shortcomings and weaknesses, Fenris is not really susceptible to out and out bribery. He does have some principles.
Hajario on the other hand, ... |
#108
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, he's back? Hrm. I had hoped he'd wandered off and died in some horrible nanobot "self-awareness and coup d'etat" incident.
Tripler It's not a thing, yet, but I imagine he'd be the first. |
#109
|
||||
|
||||
Ok, Trip, put me down for June 12.
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
None of us have the power to ban you. So, we've created a work around to banning you. And it's working because you're afraid to post. ![]() |
#111
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Tripler I call him an even-keeled, unadulterated, rampant fraud on all counts. |
#112
|
||||
|
||||
These are not the droids you are looking for.
|
#113
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Watch this... Last edited by C2H5OH; 20th April 2020 at 07:45 PM. |
#114
|
||||
|
||||
I'm gonna go for Labor Day, September 7th!
|
#115
|
||||
|
||||
See? We can keep this contest going FOREVER!!!!!!! But you have to either A) start posting again, and eventually get yourself banned, or B) stay lurking instead of posting, which is pretty much the same result for us.
Except that no one wins the Cheetos if you just go away. You can still get the last laugh and prove your incredible mental superiority by depriving us of our prize... Last edited by C2H5OH; 20th April 2020 at 09:53 PM. |
#116
|
||||
|
||||
You're outting your socks.
|
#117
|
||||
|
||||
That one was outed long ago when I used it to post during an arbitrary and capricious Fenris-boxing. The custom title even says that I'm in disguise.
ETA: Besides, what better sock to troll Sammy with, than one explicitly named 'troll', eh? Last edited by C2H5OH; 20th April 2020 at 08:06 PM. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Far from being afraid to post here, chap. It's the simple fact that there is nothing even remotely interesting to talk about here. I've tried to raise a good couple of conversations, but you people show a distinct lack of anything interesting to even respond to. I don't think even acknowledging the level of debate is warranted. I don't need to prove anything to you, but you really need to pick up the pace a little bit.
|
#119
|
||||
|
||||
If you let me know what day you are going to get your stupid ass banned, I'll split the cheetos with you 50/50.
That's the best offer you're going to get so you might as well make a deal. |
#120
|
||||
|
||||
No. No you haven't. You've started one (1) thread about gun control, you've weighed in with your advice in two tech threads, and you've posted in this thread.
|
#121
|
||||
|
||||
Then why do you keep coming back? Hoping to get in the last word? Ain't gonna happen.
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
I pop in occasionally to see if you people do have anything enlightened or interesting to say. Like I said before I had high hopes for you, but you don't seem to be technically inclined to understand modern technology or how things work. I see already that you aim to twist my words like you did on the Straight Dope, and are probably willing to slander me here too, probably because you're too fucking ignorant to follow basic concepts, so my high hopes are set a lot lower then.
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
What the fuck. It's deniers like you that think shutting smart people out of discussions will solve anything. Its well known that artificial intelligence is well on its way to sequencing the SARS-CoV-2 genome and that results are only limited by how fast chemistry can come up with a biomedical way to safely denature the virus lining to kill it. the only hangup is how fast the government is willing to authorize release of developed treatments, and we have the liberals pleading to test it before its released. Wake up you clowns. Quantum-based intelligence has already solved this problem and the only limitations are you people accepting it. So what if a few hundred thousand have died? Small price to pay, and it's all on your hands because you refuse to accept that artificial intelligence has, in fact, solved this problem based on models developed with prior pandemics like Swine Flu and Avian Flu. We've been here before--humans are the problem.
|
#126
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And then, of course, here's another example of your utter stupidity: Quote:
I really should stop poking you. It's totally unfair engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed man-child. Last edited by C2H5OH; 21st April 2020 at 06:27 PM. |
#127
|
|||||
|
|||||
Ok, I can't resist. More poking:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
#128
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
... the only hangup is how fast the government is willing to authorize release of developed treatments, and we have the liberals pleading to test it before its released. Wake up you clowns. We'll skip this nonsense, because there isn't even anything there subject to refutability. It's just typical Sammy bluster that's pulled out when he gets his panties in a twist when people don't automatically acknowledge his 'genius'. Sure there is. One of the treatments that liberals want tested before being given to millions of people is Hydroxy Chloroquine. Turns out in VA test patients given Hydroxy Chloroquine are dying at a higher rate than those without. |
#129
|
||||
|
||||
Tell me Sammy, what exactly is AI and how does it work? Lets get right down to the nuts and bolts. Lay it on me.
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
The silliest part is that in a way Sammy is right -- but not in the way he thinks.
See, AI (including Machine Learning AI) has certainly been very useful in this crisis. There was an IBM supercomputer that was able to model the interaction between different potential chemical treatments and the protein spikes on the virus -- if we can bind a chemical to those protein chains that could help prevent the virus from reproducing. Note though that it's not like the computer spit out a cure -- what it did was whittle down among list of potential chemical inhibitors to a shorter list that could be thoroughly investigated. A much more prevalent use of AI is in modeling. And it is here that Sammy is actually right - AI generated computer models HAVE told us what we need to do to fight the virus -- stay the fuck at home. |
#131
|
||||
|
||||
He can't respond just now. I boxed him.
|
#132
|
||||
|
||||
Wow.
Just. . . wow. There are so many layers of stupidity and vapid speculation here, that I don't know if I even care to begin. Nope. I won't begin. I'll just sit back, and point, and laugh. Tripler Hey SamuelA, can you weave minorities or nanobots into this diatribe somehow? |
#133
|
||||
|
||||
Hey can I package all five of my boxings into one banning? Cause then I could totally win thay bag of Cheetos.
|
#134
|
||||
|
||||
I simultaneously call shenanigans and admire your deviousness
![]() |
#135
|
||||
|
||||
The latest updates:
----- Random Precision follows his handle with a choice of April 31st, 2020; C2H5OH drinks to May 1st, 2020; Oxirane uses a Jedi mind trick to divine May 4th, 2020. Rebo in for May 19th, 2020; Kat paws around with June 5, 2020; Rat Diva is in for June 12, 2020; Jaglavak gets pretty damn specific with June 18, at 1428. <--- (Is this a specific time zone, or UTC?) Metal Years goes to the Great White North with July 1, 2020. JackieLikesVariety is back in the game with July 4th 2020. Nominal opines July 12, 2020; Trrollish McTrollllerson catfishes with 7 Sept, 2020, but because it’s a sock, must post a picture of an orange-dust-covered sock upon receipt of the Grand Prize; Tripler doubles-down with 1 Oct, 2020; mjmlabs hops on board with 4 Nov, 2020. Did I miss anyone? Clarification needed from the Mods: Are "bannings" seperate from "permanent boxing"? I suspect a permanent boxing allows the Chief Chowderhead to keep posting in only one forum, correct? If so, and banning is a seperate action, I think we ought to come up with an alternate prize: one for banning and one for perma-boxing. Thoughts? Tripler And thanks to our Guest Chowderhead, the game is back afoot! |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
i think we should all swallow nanobots and be brainfrozen until the quantum mechanazoids solve our problems for us DURP DURP DURP!!
|
#137
|
||||
|
||||
How did you acquire the boxing right?
|
#138
|
||||
|
||||
I got compromat on Fenris.
|
#139
|
||||
|
||||
I believe I can manage that. I have plenty of actual holy socks in my rag basket. I think I can use one of them to wipe up cheeto-crumbs and post a nice picture thereof. I just hope Sammy will appreciate my efforts once I've done it.
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
i THIN KYOU SHOULD JUST SEND ME THE CHEETOS BECAUSE I WON FOR science and NANOBOTS BLAAARRAHGH
|
#141
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My suggestion: Up the ante to a Family Size bag o'Cheetos for Banning, lunch size bag for PermaBox. |
#142
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Grand Prize for Banning: Family Size bag 'o' Cheetos, [u]and[/i] a large jar of Medium Hatch Green Chili. Runner Up for PermaBoxing: Standard size bag 'o' Cheetos. Tripler I was going to say "Runner Up is 'First Loser'" but we're all winners should either case happen. |
#143
|
||||
|
||||
Can I get an attaboy for boxing him for a day.
Last edited by Glazer; 24th April 2020 at 03:19 PM. Reason: His pissed off WTF thread was the best reward. |
#145
|
||||
|
||||
Absolutely! Do it again.
![]() |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
I wasn't talking to you C2h5OH. But if you're going to be self-centered and arrogant to thikn the whole world revolves around you, then you must be special. Wrong on so many levels, but thanks for trying! AI has been crucial in mappign the genome, as used at places with biomedical and supercomputing resources happen to be, like National Laboratories.
I can't help it if you people are too stupid to know basic fundamental, accept the basics that things are working that are more advanced than you know, or you accept the future. I'll just have to leave you to your sticks and stones, while the rest of us in modern civilization survive. Good luck to you. . youre going to need it. |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#148
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Ahem. Here's a perennial question that seems to confound you. "Cite?" Provide links. Tripler Further detail for you: "Which, 'National Laboratories'?" |
#149
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
@Rebo @Pure @hajario @Fenris ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Glazer; 25th April 2020 at 09:34 AM. |
#150
|
||||
|
||||
We are all refreshed and challenged by your unique point of view.
|
![]() |
Giraffiti |
bye bye blue sky goodbye, cheetos on the line, Run rabbit run, S A Mule, trollin trollin trollin, wRAWHIDE |
|
|