Go Back   The Giraffe Boards > Main > The Game Room > Mafia Central > The Dungeon
Register Blogs GB FAQ Forum Rules Community Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 25th February 2011, 07:36 PM
Romanic's Avatar
Romanic Romanic is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanic View Post
You're funny Giraffe, I destroyed your arguments that I could be a faction changer, affecting Idle's alignment too, yet you come back at me with other (poor) arguments instead of backing off. It just seems like you want me lynched, and it could be because I am an easy target.
Yes, you made good points against a hypothesis I floated which I agreed with. So, I guess you can't be scum, right?
No... it does mean that. Don't put words in my mouth please.

However generally when two people argument about something, if someone is proven wrong, he doesn't come back quickly with more wild accusations, given that he was proven wrong the first time. Yet you keep hammering at me, who is conveniently a very easy target toDay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
Because Idle would contradict such a claim, obviously.
I don't understand how I would know that Idle would contradict a non-Miller mason claim from me, if he didn't know about my role. You did write "obviously" up there.

Suppose that I am Scum, and I have knowledge that Idle doesn't know about my alignment, from his role PM. Why claim Miller?
Suppose that I am Scum, and I don't know anything about Idle, except that I can communicate with him. Why would I claim Miller?

Oh I just love your quote, I'm gonna show it again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
Because Idle would contradict such a claim, obviously.
What is "obvious" here?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
Wow, you're really laying on the Doomsday scenario here. You must be the single most important Townie ever!
*rofl*

You can't be serious.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
I never said you should agree to your lynch, merely that it would be an obvious scenario for a Town player with your role to be willing to consider, rather than scrambling for anyone but you to go to the gallows.
Well, you wrote that I should not be averse to my lynch.

a·verse (-vûrs)
adj.
Having a feeling of opposition, distaste, or aversion; strongly disinclined: investors who are averse to taking risks.

"Not averse" would be synonym of "agreeing to", I would say. So yes, you did say that I should agree with my lynch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
Which you're continuing to do, incidentally. No Town player wants to be lynched, but scum are far more fearful of lynching due to their smaller numbers. So when a Town player reveals a role that has no clear benefit to Town, adds uncertainty to the status of at least one other player and can't be investigated, it's seems odd to me that they'd be so defensive and hostile to the idea of their lynching..
Define "so defensive". Where am I so defensive?

Define "hostile". Where do you get a hostility feeling from me?

You are using big words, let's see if you can back them up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
I'm also not buying your theory that we'll lose up to three Townies toNight. Doesn't that seem like a pretty unbalanced game to you? And even if you're right, why would that change my vote? All I can do is vote for the person I think is most likely to be scum, which right now is you.
Considering we know of 2 attacks last night, and likely another on Idle Thoughts, I don't think it's far fetched to think there could be again three attacks on Night 2. However I note that you failed to read that I said "I'd expect 1-2 Townies to die", and that you changed it for "up to three Townies".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giraffe View Post
If it helps, I'm feeling more confident about it after your last post.
Hmmmmmm.....

*****

This whole post screams exaggeration to me:
1) Saying that I am putting a Doomsday scenario, which is wrong. I am merely using the information we've seen from Night 1. We've seen 2 maybe 3 attacks on N1. How is that a Doomsday scenario that it would happen again?

2) "You must be the single most important Townie ever!" is well... I don't know how to describe it without being insulting. It's plain bullshit. I was explaining my view on why a hypothetical Townie shouldn't let himself lynched, as opposed to your view that he should not be averse to it. I wasn't even talking about me, but you're twisting it to make it look so.

3) I am apparently "So defensive", and "hostile", which I don't think I am. And I am very curious to see how you will explain these perceptions of me. Sure I don't want to be lynched, nobody does, but you seem eager to magnify this, to make me look scummier than I actually am.

You know, my miller claim is bad enough, you don't need to push this hard to get me lynched. I think a truthful Townie, one who truly thinks that I should be lynched for my claim, would not work much to find reasons to lynch me. Again, my claim is bad enough. What are you trying to do Giraffe?
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.7 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Management has discontinued messages until further notice.